तक्षशिला से मगध तक यात्रा एक संकल्प की . . .

International Conference on “Research For Resurgence” Resolves to revamp research in Academics’

स्रोत: International Conference on “Research For Resurgence” Resolves to revamp research in Academics’

Over 700 scholars from Bharat and abroad deliberated how to sublimate research for national regeneration making it socially relevant, environmentally eco-friendly and technically and economically sustainable

Days before Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the Benaras Hindu University (BHU) opened his heart about the necessity of original innovations and ideas and not just the research of ‘cut and paste’ nature to obtain only degree for jobs, scholars from different streams of science, humanities and literature, planners, decision-makers, policy and framers gathered in Nagpur to deliberate on this very theme and its application for bettering the human life. The three-day conference, Research for Resurgence, organised by Bharatiya Shikshan Mandal (BSM) at VNIT Nagpur resolved ‘to take the benefits of research to the last man standing in the row. A total of 728 scholars from Bharat and 9 other countries participated in the conference. 68 Universities from 15 States including 17 central institutes were represented. 24 Industrial houses and organizations including TATASONS, CEAT, RPG, MIDC, MADC, FICII, CII also participated. The conference was graced by the attendance of 55 Vice chancellors and heads of National Educational bodies such as NAAC, AICTE, NCTE etc. The main objective was to explore and imbibe the ‘Bharatiya perspective’ towards life when the whole world is still revolving round the ideas like ‘holistic and sustainable’ development.


Inaugurating the conference, Union HRD Minister Smriti Irani rightly criticised those who always denounce the Bharatiya research. “We must celebrate Bharatiya contribution to science and mathematics” she said appealing to the audience to consider contributions not only from the Silicon Valley but also from Damodar Valley to the field of science and technology.


Noted educationist Prof Aniruddh Deshpande said the research was very important component of education. Quest for excellence and inquisitiveness has been the academic tradition of Bharat but it seems to have disappeared due to overdose of materialism today. Stating that Bharatiya talent is still alive, we need to promote research that is good for the society. He appealed to the scholars to do research for social uplift and for this they should be ready to break the slavery of the formal system, he added. The resurgence in the research is needed to explore the ultimate goal of human life, he said adding that we must adapt and adopt the changes in technology and science for the betterment of human life.

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadanvis said his government would set up a Model Laboratory at least in each district so that the students get an opportunity to dwell into various aspects of research since their school days. This model lab will be on the lines of the one made by Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Mumbai, he said adding that he wanted to make Maharashtra a innovation State and extend full support to the research activities for human wellbeing.

IMG_1523 - Copy IMG_1546 - Copy IMG_1678 - Copy

The participants were divided into four groups for discussion viz. ‘Udyam’, ‘Sthapati’, ‘Manas’ and ‘Naipunya’. The first group ‘Udyam’ was comprised of those from industry and academia including 30 CEOs and equal number of Vice-Chancellors. They discussed the ways to draw a roadmap for industry-academia interface. Rajiv Modi, CMD of Cadila Pharmaceuticals, R Gopalkrishnan, former director of Tata Sons, SP Bansal VC of Maharaja Agrasen University and Yogesh Singh VC of Delhi Technological University were the panelists.  Rajya Sabha MP Ajay Sancheti, inaugurated the symposium. Shalini Sharma from CII was the moderator for the session.

The second group was of architects called ‘Sthapati’ which witnessed presentations from some of the best participating architects, Nimish Patel from Ahmedabad, Chitra Vishwanathan from Bangaluru, Anil Laul from Delhi being prominent amongst them. ‘Manas’ group devoted their time and energy to discuss issues related to psychology. Anand Paranjape from Canada was the chief orator amongst the psychologists who had gathered for in-depth thinking.

‘Naipunya’ was the fourth group that included young researchers. This group was more interested in honing and sharpening the skills of the upcoming researchers. Shri Narendra Karmakar who worked with NASA for supercomputer design also spoke.

Union Environment Minister Prakash Javdekar stressed on using research to know the secrets of nature but lamented “our education system is killing the research instinct” among the students. Noted water expert Madhav Chitale called for comprehensive research that would include Water, Environment, Habitation, Agriculture and Biodiversity (WEHAB). AICTE Chairman Anil Sahasrabuddhe dwelt on developing analytical mind for fundamental and applied research.

IMG_2158IMG_1682DSC_0484 - Copy



Noted economist S Gurumurthy said prejudiced mindset of the intellectuals about Bharat and everything that is Bharateeya proved fatal for innovations. “Our students have immense potential, however, many educational institutions do not have enough means for research. That’s why the country lags on research and innovation,” said noted space scientist and former Chief of ISRO Madhavan Nair. Head of Physics Department at BARC Dr BN Jagtap stressed to remove the ‘disconnect’ between science and society.

IMG_2167 (1)Union Surface Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari stressed the need to have all-encompassing vision in research to make it more useful for the people and solving their problems. Niti Aayog Member Dr VK Saraswat said the country needs nano, bio researches that would contribute to all round development of the country. VNIT Chairman Vishram Jamdar, Dr Arvind Joshi, Dr Vaman Gogate, Vinayak Kanitkar, Mukul Kanitkar, Principal GN Hadap, Prof BK Kuthiala, and other scholars were also present on the occasion. There was a ‘brainstorming’ session on the framework for research emerged out of the deliberations in the conference. With minor modifications it was decided to set up a Research for Resurgence foundation at Nagpur. The conference was co-sponsored by National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Visveswaraya National Institute of Technology (VNIT), Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University (RTMNU), Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth (PDKV), Kavikulguru Kalidas Sanskrit University (KKSU), Sant Gadgebaba Amravati University (SGBAU) and Gondwana Univeristy, Gadchiroli (GUG).

अप्रैल 27, 2016 Posted by | English Posts | , , , , | 8 टिप्पणियाँ

Look beyond political controversy, Yoga is for all

Another Post as a precursor to IYD. This piece was written for bharatniti.in giving it here for the blog followers.



Yoga has been accepted universally as a discipline of moulding one’s own life to active overall well-being, accepting it as a way of life beyond faith, worship or religious dogmas. The same was evident when more than 170 countries across five continents unanimously supported the resolution for declaring June 21 as the International Day of Yoga at the General Assembly of the UNO.

IYD LogoMany of them proposed or seconded it without any voting or discussion. In fact, many of the Islamic countries too supported the resolution. Yoga is being practiced by people beyond the religious beliefs.

On this background of universal consensus, it is ironical that the decision of the central government to celebrate the International Day of Yoga all over the country is being opposed on religious grounds by some misguided elements. When the whole world is unanimous about the universal appeal of Yoga, it is a shame that this great science of living is being subjected to controversy in the land of its origin.

Social media is full of photographs of members of different communities performing Yogic exercises. The universal acceptance of Yoga is very much witnessed across different communities in India.

Controversy more of political concoction than popular

The present fabricated controversy over the celebration of the International Day of Yoga is the result of intolerant minds. Yoga is a science which demands experiments and experiences and does not ask one to believe or un-believe anything. The performance of Yoga does not affect any belief systems. If at all it will enhance ones capacity to have undeterred in one’s own beliefs. Yoga is necessarily an Bharatiya philosophy as it was first compiled in this holy land and has all the attributes of Sanatana Dharma because it was practiced, experimented and evolved into different systems by generations of Hindus. But it still is a universally applicable science of life and the art of living.

The practice of Yoga will not swerve the individual from his personal religious beliefs. It will also not make him antagonistic to his or any other religion but will, on the contrary, augment his affection for his personal deity. The practice of Yoga will not proselytize a Muslim or a Christian, but will on the contrary make him a better adherent of his faiths. Thus, no one should be afraid of Yoga as it includes all and excludes none.

So what is Yoga actually?

Yoga is beyond a mere physical exercise. In fact, Yoga is neither mere physical exercise nor is it just a therapy. As per the ancient traditions, it is a way of scientific living. A modern being may find it hard to comprehend but the mind is the prime factor of all our actions in life. And yoga is nothing but the training of the mind. Thus it (yoga) enables perfection in every action at all levels. The whole universe functions in disciplined manner. There are laws of existence which govern the natural phenomena irrespective of any subjective intervention. The only exception to this smooth governance of the universe are human beings.

The humans are endowed with the will to act and the power of imagination. The combination of these two have created all the scientific wonders. Like all kinds of powers, this also needs regulation. If uncontrolled, power becomes corrupt and boon is converted into a curse. This is true at individual as well as collective level.

Sage Patanjali, in his Yoga aphorisms, initiates with a simple statement – ath yoga anushasanam [Thus we begin the discipline of Yoga.] The aim of all the yogic practices right from Asanas, Suryanamaskara, Pranayamas up to Dhyana [meditation] and Samadhi is disciplining the mind. If the mind is concentrated, anything and everything can be accomplished.

Yoga is the way of orienting the mental powers to one’s aim. The conflicts and clashes in the world are a result of intolerance born out of lack of coordination among one’s own multiple roles. There are various schools of Yoga and they have different practices.

There are several variants of the same Yogic practice. Some well- meaning noble Acharyas even tried to standardize yogic practices. This futile effort has not succeeded as diversity is an inherent feature of existence. Everything that exists is unique in its form, function and role. Yoga not only takes into account this diverse uniqueness but also enriches the extraordinary individuality of the seeker, the performer. At the same time, yoga helps the sadhaka (practitioner, the doer) to realize the underlying oneness behind the apparent diversity.

So, whatever be the practice, if the mind is tuned properly with a synchronized awareness and relaxation, it integrates one with all. Essence is not in the action but in the intent. Yoga literally means union. Every practice that enables the mind to expand and unite the different levels of collectivity is Yoga. Yoga gives quietude, peace and harmony to the individual mind and if performed regularly by a sizable portion of the humanity, will spread this peace and harmony to the cosmic world.

One can say with full conviction that the mass performance of various Yoga practices on the historic occasion of the International Day of Yoga on June 21 will definitely lead to conflict free and harmonious world.

जून 18, 2015 Posted by | सामायिक टिपण्णी, English Posts | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 टिप्पणियाँ

let us untie the knots

Krishna - New forever 02There are three basic principles of pedagogy or Educational Methodology- Near to Far, Known to unknown and subtle to gross. The student should be provided education about what is close to him, before imparting the education about matters related to the distant. The range has to be gradually increased in this order and finally we can reach the level of the entire creation and the universe. Second principle is that the spectrum of the knowledge from the unknown to the known should be used as a basis for the gradual acquisition of the knowledge. The third principle of education is to proceed from the subtle to the gross. These basic principles are not being followed in the present system of education. This is the cause of the education becoming dry, weary and complicated. We can not develop sukshm pragya [subtle insight] by teaching the laws of the gross, materialistic world. It will become easy for us to understand the characteristics of the gross after assimilating the subtle thoughts and their subsequent reflections and discussions.

Bhagwan Sri Krishna elucidates this method in the Bhagwad-Geeta. He challenges the Kshatriya Dharma of Arjuna, for impugning the grieved state of Arjuna. He touches the topic which is closest to the heart of Arjuna and advises him, not to succumb to the state of unmanliness as it does not befit you. Sri Krishna refers to topics like Swarga [heaven] and Kirti [reputation] and admonishes Arjuna for his unheavenly and disgraceful behaviour. It meant that the action of Arjuna would keep him away from heaven as well bring ignominy to him. Due to the onslaught on his grief struck mind, Arjuna recognizes the cowardice brewing in his mind. As a result of the parochial nature of his mental state, he could detect the sorrow and cowardice overwhelming his mind. Earlier in the first chapter Arjuna not only supports his escapism but also ennobles it. He justifies it being in accordance with Dharma. The intellectual hypocrisy of  Arjuna crumbles after the assailing treatment by Sri Krishna and his mind craves for the acceptance of the truth. The first step in the direction of disciplehood is the readiness of the mind to accept the truth. “कार्पण्यदोषोपहतस्वभावः पृच्छामि त्वां धर्मसंमूढचेताः ||” The mind which has become afflicted with the guilt consciousness of cowardice gets deluded about what is Dharma and what is adharma. I cannot understand the difference between the two and so I am asking you’.

The voice which always points out our flaws, is eternally alive within us. It always points out all our weaknesses. However we ignore it as we are overwhelmed with our conceit. The mind gradually gets into the habit of justifying all our inanities and ennobling our habits. It develops into a psychological complex and gradually evolves as our ‘alter ego’. If any friend or well wisher brings that to our attention, we feel insulted. The mind cannot accept any exhortation as long as that knot is not untied. We have to untie our knots in the presence of the Guru. The Guru introduces us to our knots. But we only have to loosen and untie them. An experiment in the form of a game played by children in the camps, makes this matter clear. A child is told to close his fist, while another is told to open it. In spite of trying very hard, the child can not open the fists of the other person. Then the instructor says that he would utter a mantra and the fist would get opened. The teacher says something in the ear of the student and his fist gets opened in the very next attempt. Everyone gets surprised as to what mantra it is. The mantra given by the teacher is simply that ‘ When he tries to open your fist, you open it’.

The lesson conveyed through the game is that as long we do not desire, no other person can open our fist. The knotsBG vishvrup of the mind are like that. They cannot be opened by the efforts of some other person. They have to be opened very gently by us. After Arjuna becomes the disciple of Lord Krishna, he is blessed with the vision of his Universal form, which is the subtlest knowledge in the world. The message of the Geeta starts with the immortality of the Self while its final objective was to inspire Arjuna for performing his Karma and duties. Sri Krishna commences his elucidation about the immortal, eternal self so that Arjuna acquires the knowledge of the most gross duty related to the battlefield.  This is the best method of teaching. Nowadays we have regarded the subtlest knowledge as belonging to the domain of spiritualism and are distancing education from it. The syllabi have become completely mundane, in the name of practicality. But efficient behaviour is possible only after understanding the subtlest knowledge.

Arjuna was not ready to proceed on the path of his duty even after listening to the logical exhortations about Gyan [knowledge], Bhakti [devotion], Karma [action] and the highly sublime Raja Yoga. He asks numerous questions which are beautifully answered by Lord Krishna but finds himself incapable of forsaking his attachment. Then Lord Krishna blesses him with a vision of his cosmic form. Only the vision of his cosmic form will dispel all the doubts. This is the final knowledge. The Geeta gives the true message of the dedication to the Virata [cosmic form]. Arjuna gets not only confounded but also terrified by this cosmic vision. Arjuna, with folded hands tells Sri Krishna, ”I used to regard you as my friend and due to the lack of knowledge, did not behave properly with you”. This friendly affinity was in fact the foundation of Arjuna’s disciplehood. Krishna is our friend also. When we recognize him as our friend, he blesses us with a vision of his cosmic form. We shall be able to discern the sacredness present in each particle and the immanent divinity in every creature. This will enable us to march fearlessly on the path of our duty.

Come, let us untie the knots of our mind and become the disciple as well as the friend of Lord Krishna.

दिसम्बर 11, 2014 Posted by | सामायिक टिपण्णी, English Posts | , , , , , , , , , , | टिप्पणी करे


There has been an eternal battle between the Dharma and the Adharma. It has been occurring since the era of the Mahabharata. The selfish people whose allegiance was towards  some individuals, rallied in the Kaurava army, for the fulfillment of their ulterior motives. Even the valiant Bhishma Pitamaha, who was endowed with a noble thoughts and an impeccable character got constrained by the shackles of his personal oath and joins the army of Adharma. Guru Dronacharya who had been encumbered by the onus of the illusory gratitude towards the Kauravas, while blessing Yudishtara, nevertheless got influenced by his allegiance and formulated a strategy of creating a Chakravyuha. On the other hand the army fighting for the Dharma, was also wrought with personal ambitions, oaths and vengeance. Everyone was not fighting for attaining a common goal. Then what was the difference between them. Were the Pandavas on the side of the Dharma and the Kauravas against it? Was it because they were seeking retribution for the injustice meted out to them?  Were they avenging the dishonour done to Draupadi? No…

bhagawadgitaThe side of the Pandavas becomes associated with Dharma only due to the charioteer, Lord Krishna. His message of Dharma converts the family feud into a battle of Dharma. The battle in Mahabharata would have remained a struggle between two brothers in the absence of Geeta, at the start of the battle. The exhortation of the Karma, is a ceaseless message for the establishment of the Dharma. All our personal objectives get elevated to a noble level, by the benediction of the Geeta. They serve as contrivances for establishing Dharma. The gist of the Dharma is shrouded in the first and the last word of the Geeta. The first shloka is spoken by Dhritarashtra whose attachment for his son, is the fundamental reason for this war. ‘ धर्म षेत्रे कुरु क्षेत्रे ‘. Dharma is the first word. The last shloka of the Geeta is uttered by the first clairvoyant correspondent of known history. यत्र योगेश्वरो कृष्ण यत्र पार्थो धनुर्धरः | तत्र श्री विजयी भूति धृवा नीतिर्मतिर्मम || The last word is मम[ me]. The subject of Geeta is मम धर्म- my Dharma-Swadharma. Geeta instructs on what is to be done in any circumstances. Geeta guides us into metamorphosing our individual-centric thoughts into holistic thoughts.

Everything which has come into existence has a definite objective. The creation of lifeless objects by the human race, even has a objective. The most expensive car, cannot be even regarded as a vehicle, meant for own transportation. It is made for ferrying the driver and the other passengers to their destination. The chair is made so as to perform the function of making others comfortable. It does not seek its own comfort. When all these objects have been created for serving others, when their existence has a definite  objective, how can the human race that deem itself to be the most superior of all the living beings, be selfish? This is caused by lack of self consciousness. Arjuna was also afflicted by this ailment, at the beginning of the Geeta. He got completely overwhelmed by the sorrow of the imminent death of his loved ones, due to his illusion of regarding the battle as a means for fulfilling his personal interests.

vikalpThe entire world has presently, got deluded about his self-consciousness. As his vision has got dazzled by the external glitz and glamour, he has lost the identity of the truth. This identity crisis is the root cause of all the trouble tension, crime, violence, communalism, terrorism and robbery in the world. Man is trying to escape from himself. The increasing importance of ostentation in worship indicates this tendency of escapism. The religion propounded by the descendants of Abraham has been regarding their strife for augmenting their political hegemony and numerical preponderance, as a battle for Dharma and   shading human blood for the last few centuries. The fallacy of regarding the environment as a means for fulfilling the vested interests is also responsible for this delusion about the self consciousness. All this is propelling the world to a cataclysmic culmination. The Mahabharata also witnessed this kind of catastrophe. Geeta imparted relevance to the battle. Hence Dharma was established after the war and sublime peace which gave joy to all reigned for various eras and attained a lofty reputation.

Geeta is alive even today. Yogeshwar Krishna is eager to guide us even today. Are we ready to rouse the spirit of Arjuna. Arjuna attained his disciple hood in the  seventh shloka of the second chapter. शिष्यस्तेहम शाधि माम् त्वां प्रपन्नं After accepting our drawbacks and attaining disciple hood, Geeta will manifest itself. Are we prepared for this?

दिसम्बर 3, 2014 Posted by | सामायिक टिपण्णी, English Posts | , , , , , , , , | 1 टिप्पणी

I am neither a politician nor a social reformer!

CHICAGO_1893_20x30_21_RGB_FINAL_00What was the purpose of Swami Vivekananda’s life? Though it may be deemed arrogant to ask such a question, for those who want to follow his path it is very important to address this basic query in right spirit. The purpose of life is what makes the personality what it is.

Swamiji as an Avatar?

Some devotees like to believe Swamiji to be an avatar and they would simply say the purpose of avatar is to establish Dharma and that’s what Swamiji did. But the founder of Vivekananda Kendra, Ma EknathjiRanade would consider calling Swamiji an avatar as an escapists’argument. By calling him avatar we are shunning our responsibility to follow his path. On the other hand it is belittling his achievements also. ”If he was a divine incarnation, I feel, what he did was not very much. But on the other hand if I think he was as human as any one of us then I feel that he has achieved a great height. At the same time, I get the inspiration to keep a noble goal before myself and to emulate his path to greatness.” Eknathji would argue.

What were Swamiji’s thoughts on the matter? He has uttered many a things about himself. He has also written about his life’s mission in some of his letters. But never has he called himself an avatar. That should be the ultimate test. Notwithstanding the vision of ShriRamakrishnaParamahamsa reported by some devotees to back their avatar claim; we will be more honest if we use Swamiji’s method to decide the issue. Narendra was also faced with the samedilemma about his Guru. Many devotees called ShriRamakrishna an avatar. Narendra himself had many miraculous experiences with the great master. He attained NirvikalpaSamadhi, had Shaktipat(Transfer of Spiritual power by touch) and also the SakaraDarshan(Vision in Form) of Mother Kali by the grace of the great Guru. Still he could not come to a definite conclusion as to Shri Ramakrishna being a divine incarnation till the very last days of Thakur. To resolve the dilemma he decides in his mind, ”I will accept him as a divine incarnation, an avatar, only if he himself directly tells me so.” It is documented that he got the answer then and there. As if the Guru was reading the mind of the disciple, Thakur, taking Narendra’s hand proclaimed very clearly, ”One who was Rama, who was Krishna, has now born as Ramakrishna”; leaving no ambiguity whatsoever.

Hence we must apply the same test for deciding whether Swamiji was an Avatar or not. According to the documented and available information he never claimed to be one. He was not shy of speaking about himself. As early as in1891 he is known to have said, ”I will burst upon the Indian society like a bomb”. He fulfilled this self prophecy. Talking to his disciple he extolled, ”I may leave this mortal body, but I will continue to work for next 1500 years.” So he does. But there is no mention of his calling himself an Avatar. Thus till any such new discoveries are found we are bound to take Swamiji’ word for his purpose of life as a human being rather than an Avatar.

References to his mission:

He has distinctly made a few comments on his mission which was dawned upon him in the intense meditation at the ShreepadShila in Kanyakumari. He had written in one of his letters to ShashiMaharaj, Swami Ramakarishnanda, ”Sitting on the last bit of Mother Bharat, I hit upon a plan”. He has explained his plan of campaign in a lecture in Madras after his triumphant return from the west. But we are after the purpose of his life. The mission and plans are to fulfill the purpose. What was the purpose of Swamiji’slife? He himself had struggled hard within and without to find this. He was convinced that there was a noble purpose but most of the time it was elusive. On Hatharas station he told the station master SaratChandraChakroborty, who later became his first sanyasi disciple, Swami Sadananda, ”I see my purpose of life like the hill covered by the morning mist. My destiny beckons me. I have to move on.”

What others say:

Many people have given him many lofty attributes and rightly so. Some called him the patriot monk, warrior monk, the savior of Hinduism, the second Shankarcharya, a social reformer. Bhagini Nivedita says about his address in the Chicago, “Of the Swami’s address before the Parliament of Religions, it may be said that when he began to speak it was of ‘the religious ideas of the Hindus’, but when he ended, Hinduism had been created.” Thus almost announcing him the father of neo-Hinduism. He has been creditedas one of the greatest pioneers of Indian renaissance in the 19th century. His own brother BhupendranathDutt talks about his (failed) plans of organizing political revolution to free India from foreign rule. Likes of Bipin Chandra Pal and Brajendranath Seal would agree to call him a political activist. This may not be authenticated by available documents but there is no doubt that his life and message inspired generations of freedom fighters both of armed and nonviolent type.

“He was so great, so profound, so complex. A Yogi of the highest spiritual level in direct communion with the truth who had for the time being consecrated his whole life to the moral and spiritual uplift of his nation and of humanity, that is how I would describe him. If he had been alive, I would have been at his feet” Said Subhash Chandra Bose many a times. On the other hand Rajaji, Sri Chakravarthi Rajagopalachari calls him a savior of Hinduism, “Swami Vivekananda saved Hinduism and saved India. But for him, we would have lost our religion and would not have gained our freedom. We therefore owe everything to Swami Vivekananda.”BalGangadharTilak who had hosted Swamiji in Pune during his wanderings equates him with AdiShankaracharya, “It is an undisputed fact that it was Swami Vivekananda who first held aloft the banner of Hinduism as a challenge against the material science of the West. It was Swami Vivekananda who first took on his shoulders this stupendous task of establishing the glory of Hinduism in different countries across the borders. And he, with his erudition, oratorical power, enthusiasm, and inner force, laid that work upon a solid foundation. Twelve centuries ago Shankara was the only great personality who not only spoke of the purity of our religion… but also brought all this into action. Swami Vivekananda is a person of that stature.” Rabindranath Tagore when asked by the french Historian Roman Rolland, how can he understand the spirit of India? Said, “If you want to know India, study Vivekananda.”

Father of Hindu Nationalism:

The accolades he received during his lifetime and thereafter are countless and the list still continues to grow longer and longer. Even the critics of Hinduism in the modern times in search of the roots of Hindu upsurge during the Ramjanmbhumiagitation reach back to Swamiji for so called ideological foundations. They try to put the blame on Swamiji among others for the revival of Hindu Nationalistic spirit. He is considered to be father of Hindu Nationalism by those in favor as well as those against the idea.

Preacher of Vedanta:

There are many others who are fascinated by his depth of spiritual knowledge. The scientific way in which he articulated the mysteries of highest spiritual knowledge is unparallel. Hence he was called the foremost preacher of Vedanta in the west. It is also claimed by some that he conquered the west and converted many to Vedanta.

Swamiji’s personality and his message was multifaceted hence there are many ways of understanding Swami Vivekananda. Each one does it from one’s own respective point of view. This has made Swamiji the most acceptable, non controversial ideal of the modern times. People from opposing camps use his quotations to prove their side of argument and blame the other of misrepresenting him. The left ideologues who denigrate religion also accept Swamiji’s views on the regeneration of deprived masses. But in all this process, sometimes, there is a deliberate effort to dilute Swamiji’sNationalism, his in-depth understanding of the soul of Bharat. He was the first religious and spiritual leader to proclaim that the soul of Bharat was ‘Dharma’. He was the first proponent of the concept of Hindurashtra, the Hindu nation. This should not be forgotten and any effort to prove it otherwise is an attempt to twist his message to suit the present day vested political interest.

Self Prophesy:

In this cacophony of diverse and sometimes even contradictory claims about Swamiji how do we find the answer to our query? What was the purpose of Swamiji’slife? Here again we must rely on the original text rather than the interpretationswhich may be within or out of proper context. Is there any statement of the Swami about his own self? What was his view about himself and his work? There are loads of indirect references in his speeches in India. There are a few direct discussions recorded by his disciples which give us an insight in to his mind. But the most direct statement on the topic is,”I am not a politician, nor am I a social reformer. It is my job to fashion man…Man-making is my mission of life.”

To Fashion Man:

What a great statement? To Fashion man! What does it means when one uses the verb to fashion?  Rogers’s thesaurus gives us a lot of options – to design, to tailor, to style, to mould, to modify etc. When we apply it to humans what will be the most consistent meaning. To fashion man- is to transform. To use Swamiji’s own words, ‘to enable man to manifest the perfection already within.’ To fashion is to train to realize the potential divinity in practical life. To make one actualize the full potential.To make one realize the special purpose of his life and to progress on that path.

Swamiji did that all his life. He transformed the life of everyone he touched. The list is long and varied. Swamiji’s man making technology which Sister Nivedita later on qualified by adding its prime objective as ”Man Making for Nation Building” was unique for each of its beneficiary. To study this transformation brought about by Swamiji in hundreds of people is an interesting way to understand the science of human excellence and the various methods of unfolding it.

Self Transformation by Efforts:

The mission started early in his life. The first experiment of his self proclaimed job was on his own personality. It is an interesting saga of self transformation through intense enquiry, struggle within and without, experimentations and in short total and continuous efforts. The whole journey is in four distinct stages Biley to Narendra, Narendra to Sachchidananda/vividishananda (his sanyasi names during the initial wanderings), Kolkata to Kanyakumari -From Wanderer to a determined Vivekananda with a mission and finally the Missionary Vivekananda Chicago to Bellur. This is not the occasion to examine the whole journey but the methods of Fashioning involved. The prime urge was to realize, to experience. No pretence, no belief no acceptance without thorough logic and questioning. He not only questioned others, but his self questioning continued all through his life till the end. As confidant as he was of his mission and the success of it, still he kept on asking am I on the right path. His openness to discussions and acceptance to change at any stage is really inspiring. Though the process went on all his life the most important period of intense self-transformation is his encounters with Shri Ramakrishna. That fashioned the Vivekananda that we know. It was not an easy process. The struggle went on. Both of them suffered a lot. Each one sticking to ones own ways. Swamiji’s adamancy was to be tamed only by realization. He did many experiments under the guidance of his Guru. This acceptance of Thakur as Guru also came only after the mystic experience of the oneness through touch- Shaktipat. But the final surrender and giving up of the rigid ego was done by the greatest of the experiences – Vision of Kali as a Chinmayi (living, conscious mother). This was the turning point which made him realize that the divine was omnipotent, omniscient and can be realized in all forms. This made him internalize the revolutionary Gospel of ShriRamakrishna – Shiv BhaveJeevSeva. Serve the living being with the full understanding of its divinity. This becamehis life mantra, “Service to humanity as an offering to the divinity.”

The self acceptedvocation to Fashion man continued more vigorously after the Guru left the mortal form. The initial period of 3-4 years was very testing. The domestic situation was worsening. Thakur had given him the responsibility to keep the Sangh, the monastic order of young disciples together. The householder devotees had their own ideas. During this period Narendra kept all his brother disciples in constant contact and saw to it that they did not forget the call of the master as well as their inner fire of Vairagya was kept alive. It was a daunting task. The whole well meaningworld of relatives, families and even the householder followers of Thakur were against the idea. But Narendra kept it alive in the tough times and gave it a shape in VarahnagarMath.

This man-making mission continued throughout his life and even there after. We see great examples of total transformations in this journey. There are examples like Swami Ramtirh, a Professor of Mathematics in Lahore, who attended Swamiji’s lectures there on Common Bases of Hinduism and Vedanta and got so inspired that he renounced and became a great Sanyasi. But there are few example of Man-making that will give us the insight into the science of the art of Human Fashioning. We will try and study some of them in detail in the next part.


मई 5, 2014 Posted by | English Posts | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | टिप्पणी करे

Call for Rebooting Education System

TNIEThe New Indian Express deserves congratulations for publishing the series ‘Think Edu Conclave’. The articles by Amita Sharma in the 4th March issue [page 9], and that of  Dr. S. Vaidhyasubramaniam  in the issue of 11th March [page 7] both are really commendable.

Amita Sharma has given very comprehensive overview of the work going on in various IIT’s in the field of research in ancient Bhartiya knowledge system. Her approach towards this subject is very logical and scientific. Without unduly glorifying the traditional achievements of Bharatiya scientists from time immemorial, she emphasises the need of indepth study of their works. Her concluding point appeals to the intellectual mind to come out of dogmatic thinking in terms of binaries such as traditional and modern,  eastern and western and to integrate whole knowledge system for the betterment of humanity.

It has been understood in Bharat that knowledge has no boundaries. “आ नो भद्र: क्रतवो यन्तु विश्वत:” Bharat has been traditionally an open society where knowldge and wisdom are welcomed from all the frontiers. The only purpose of knowledge as per Bharatiya tradition has been the search of inherent oneness- truth and it’s applications for the good of whole humanity. Hence, as beautifully elaborated by Dr. S. Vaidhyasubramaniam in his piece, the traditional knowledge system in Bharat had been widespread and well evolved even in the first decades of 19th century.  

dharmapalDr. S. Vaidhyasubramaniam has extensively quoted from the seminal work of Shri Dharmpal. The data given in Dharmpal’s ‘One Beautiful Tree’ from the primary sources of British surveys is an eyey opener for all of us. It is indeed tragic that this great knowledge has not been made part of formal curriculum even after being in public domain for more than five decades now. read dharmapal here – http://www.samanvaya.com/dharampal/

Both the accomplished authors lament the fact that Bharatiya traditional knowledge system has been neglected completely by the formal education system in independent India. It is indeed hightime that we in Bharat take the revolutionary step of integrating our own indegeneous knowledge system in the main stream education policy. Whole world is facing similar problems in the field of education. Right kind of methodolgy for elementary education is an area of concern for both developed and developing countries. We have the advantage of having a deep rooted cultural background in evolving decentralised, need based, socially self-sufficient education system. We have done so for centuries together. With this genetic advantage we can provide a panacea to the universal problems of complementry education system; with the use of modern technology blended with traditional methodology. This is the paradigm shift called for by both the learned authors.

There is a hope that the atmosphere for complete change in the country auguers well to this much needed systemic change in the field of education right from primary to higher education.

See the original article in TNIE here




Both of them were speaker at the event 


मार्च 14, 2014 Posted by | सामायिक टिपण्णी, English Posts | , , , , , , , , | टिप्पणी करे

Do not be a Job-seeker Be a Job-giver

This is published in Organiser April 14 issue.


youthTHE crime rate in the cities is on the rise. They blame it on unemployment. Unemployed youth is the devils workshop as he does not have anything productive to be engaged in. On the other hand they have dreams of earning fast money. In search of short cuts to hard cash they inevitably land in some kind of crime racket. This is revealed in the interrogation of suspects of numerous crimes ranging from petty thefts to murder. One of the astonishing facts is that most of these young first time criminals are either well educated or students. So it is not lack of education that is the cause of this perversion of mind. It is much deeper.

The aim of education in modern Bharat has become employment. It is official now. Job-oriented education has been the goal of our national educational policy for more than three decades. It is debatable whether we have achieved any tangible success in employment generation through continuously increasing spread of education. But we have definitely succeeded in making employment a national goal of our young generation.
Everybody is in search of a job. While choosing the course of study only consideration is the employability of the graduates of that course. The higher the job guarantee higher the demand for admission in the course. Packages offered and placements achieved are the prime factors in the propaganda material of the so-called professional educational institutes. It seems the whole country is striving to become an employee. There is no urge on the part of students and encouragement on the part of family, society or government to be entrepreneurs.

Starting any business is considered risky. Those trained to be engineers are not confident enough to start a small manufacturing unit. This lack of risk, hard work and productivity is the cause of moral degradation of the young generation. Jobs are considered safer; government service is the safest bet hence we see a beeline of aspirants for these vacancies. When a requirement for peon is advertised, thousands of youth apply. Most of them are over qualified. Even for the civil service exams the aspirants are out of proportion to the number of vacancies. More than a hundred thousand appear for the six hundred odd seats in the civil services examination. What is more baffling is the number of professional graduates appearing in competitive exams.  We find qualified medical doctors aspiring to become civil servants. One trained in the noblest of the professions lining up to be a government servant shows the pathology of the social psyche. When the brightest minds of the country aspire to become honorable slaves how can we expect the country to achieve real independence? Political freedom was gained in 1947 but real independence is yet to be achieved by Bharat. There is a need to start a nationwide movement for real independence. It has to be a multipronged effort. But most important basic ingredient will be independence of mind.

It is said that ‘Real education is one that liberates. (sa vidya yaa vimuktaye). This changes the revolutionwhole paradigm.  The aim of education does not remain bread earning but it becomes much higher. Education should be able to create confident, qualified, developed personality. For such a well-accomplished person earning livelihood will be the easiest thing. Then he will not be compelled to choose most available source of employment but would create opportunities of his own liking. He will aspire to achieve rather than just earn. He/ she will choose the path according to their own inner core and work hard to realize their dreams.
It is estimated that Bharat will have largest population of employable youth in imminent future. The greatest challenge for the policy-makers is to take full advantage of this demographic dividend. If not, this will become an unbearable burden for the country. The ancient nation with the youngest population needs a fundamental shift in approach towards economics, development and most crucially towards education. No nation can productively use youth to the tune of 65 crore if it encourages them to be employees only. If large number of these youth are going to depend on private or government jobs for their survival we are looking at a disaster in waiting. A more pragmatic approach suitable to conditions of the country will be to promote our younger generation to become employers rather than employees. ‘Don’t be Job seeker be a Job giver’ should be the motto of higher education in Bharat.

Self-employment in all sectors needs to be given highest incentive. ‘Small is beautiful’ should be the theme. Small should become more profitable. Decentralized economic vibrancy can be achieved if the youth are motivated to think creatively and be productive. They should be equipped by education to be economically independent. Rather than focusing of urbanization of the rural population we must create economic opportunities in the remote areas. Agriculture in Bharat has been traditionally the largest bread earner. More than 60% of our agricultural land holdings are small and medium farmers. We must strengthen these. Farming must be made a profitable economic activity. Many well educated youth are doing experiments in organic farming. These experiments need to be encouraged and replicated all over the country.
This does not need government patronage.  A social movement is what is necessary. Let the society take lead. A self employed person needs to be given more respect. Social mindset has to be groomed. We have to create icons out of youth engaged in productive activity on their own. A petty hawker selling vegetables earns to the tune of 1000 to 2000 Rs. per day in the metros. He needs to be given more respect than a government employee earning 20000 Rs. per month. These self employed youth should be felicitated by the society. They should be presented before the youth in the colleges as icons.

National skill development corporation was formed with the aim to promote, train and recognize skills for encouraging self-employment. It has remained another government initiative. Tens of thousands of crore rupees in the budget of NSDC lapsed  for the lack of projects. To make skill development successful it must become a social movement. Youth aspiring to be self employed should be backed by society. Capital generation through micro investment and co-operative movement is another step which will complement the young entrepreneurship movement.
There are many more steps that are needed to be taken. But the most urgent is the change of attitude. Education is the tool for attitudinal correction. The aim of education should be gain knowledge to be able to stand on our own feet. Educated youth should have self esteem.  They must be able to apply their knowledge with pride in their own field of interest. Earning then becomes but a by-product in the creative life of contribution. Let us build a society based on these values. A self reliant society is the pre-requisite for a really sovereign, independent and prosperous nation.
Let as all proclaim to our youth. ‘Do not be a Job-seeker Be a Job-giver’ – Be the change that you want to bring.

अप्रैल 8, 2013 Posted by | सामायिक टिपण्णी, English Posts | , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 टिप्पणी

My Master

आज अंगरेजी तिथि के अनुसार श्री रामकृष्ण परमहंस की जयंती है | हमारे युग के युगावतार श्री रामकृष्ण ने धर्मसंस्थापना के लिए अवतार लिया था | उनके परम शिष्य स्वामी विवेकानंद द्वारा उनके बारे में कहे गए वचन अत्यंत प्रेरक व ज्ञानवर्धक है| श्रीरामकृष्ण जयंती के अवसर पर ये आपके सेवार्थ सादर प्रस्तुत है| हिंदी में पुस्तक “मेरे गुरुदेव” अंतरताने से उतरनी होगी| Jay bhagavan!


Today is The 176th Birth anniversary of Shri Ramkrishna Paramahansa.Was Shri Ramakrishna an avatar?

Narendra was also faced with the same dilemma about his Guru. Many devotees called Shri Ramakrishna an avatar. Narendra himself had many miraculous experiences with the great master. He attained Nirvikalp Samadhi, had Shaktipat (Transfer of Spiritual power by touch) and also the Sakara Darshan (Vision in Form) of Mother Kali by the grace of the great Guru. Still he could not come to a definite conclusion as to Shri Ramakrishna being a divine incarnation till the very last days of Thakur. To resolve the dilemma he decides in his mind, ”I will accept him as a divine incarnation, an avatar, only if he himself directly tells me so.” It is documented that he got the answer then and there. As if the Guru was reading the mind of the disciple, Thakur, taking Narendra’s hand proclaimed very clearly, ”One who was Rama, who was Krishna, has now born as Ramakrishna”; leaving no ambiguity whatsoever.

Swami Vivekananda has paid a moving tribute to the guru in his lecture in New york and London. Here we present the same for you reading on this auspicious day as a humble offering at the feet of Yugavatar Shri Ramakarishna.


(Two lectures delivered in New York and England in 1896 were combined subsequently under the present heading.)

“Whenever virtue subsides and vice prevails, I come down to help mankind,” declares Krishna, in the Bhagavad-Gitâ. Whenever this world of ours, on account of growth, on account of added circumstances, requires a new adjustment, a wave of power comes; and as a man is acting on two planes, the spiritual and the material, waves of adjustment come on both planes. On the one side, of the adjustment on the material plane, Europe has mainly been the basis during modern times; and of the adjustment on the other, the spiritual plane, Asia has been the basis throughout the history of the world. Today, man requires one more adjustment on the spiritual plane; today when material ideas are at the height of their glory and power, today when man is likely to forget his divine nature, through his growing dependence on matter, and is likely to be reduced to a mere money-making machine, an adjustment is necessary; the voice has spoken, and the power is coming to drive away the clouds of gathering materialism. The power has been set in motion which, at no distant date, will bring unto mankind once more the memory of its real nature; and again the place from which this power will start will be Asia.

This world of ours is on the plan of the division of labour. It is vain to say that one man shall possess everything. Yet how childish we are! The baby in its ignorance thinks that its doll is the only possession that is to be coveted in this whole universe. So a nation which is great in the possession of material power thinks that that is all that is to be coveted, that that is all that is meant by progress, that that is all that is meant by civilisation, and if there are other nations which do not care for possession and do not possess that power, they are not fit to live, their whole existence is useless! On the other hand, another nation may think that mere material civilisation is utterly useless. From the Orient came the voice which once told the world that if a man possesses everything that is under the sun and does not possess spirituality, what avails it? This is the oriental type; the other is the occidental type.

Each of these types has its grandeur, each has its glory. The present adjustment will be the harmonising, the mingling of these two ideals. To the Oriental, the world of spirit is as real as to the Occidental is the world of senses. In the spiritual, the Oriental finds everything he wants or hopes for; in it he finds all that makes life real to him. To the Occidental he is a dreamer; to the Oriental the Occidental is a dreamer playing with ephemeral toys, and he laughs to think that grown-up men and women should make so much of a handful of matter which they will have to leave sooner or later. Each calls the other a dreamer. But the oriental ideal is as necessary for the progress of the human race as is the occidental, and I think it is more necessary. Machines never made mankind happy and never will make. He who is trying to make us believe this will claim that happiness is in the machine; but it is always in the mind. That man alone who is the lord of his mind can become happy, and none else. And what, after all, is this power of machinery? Why should a man who can send a current of electricity through a wire be called a very great man and a very intelligent man? Does not nature do a million times more than that every moment? Why not then fall down and worship nature? What avails it if you have power over the whole of the world, if you have mastered every atom in the universe? That will not make you happy unless you have the power of happiness in yourself, until you have conquered yourself. Man is born to conquer nature, it is true, but the Occidental means by “nature” only physical or external nature. It is true that external nature is majestic, with its mountains, and oceans, and rivers, and with its infinite powers and varieties. Yet there is a more majestic internal nature of man, higher than the sun, moon, and stars, higher than this earth of ours, higher than the physical universe, transcending these little lives of ours; and it affords another field of study. There the Orientals excel, just as the Occidentals excel in the other. Therefore it is fitting that, whenever there is a spiritual adjustment, it should come from the Orient. It is also fitting that when the Oriental wants to learn about machine-making, he should sit at the feet of the Occidental and learn from him. When the Occident wants to learn about the spirit, about God, about the soul, about the meaning and the mystery of this universe, he must sit at the feet of the Orient to learn.

I am going to present before you the life of one man who has put in motion such a wave in India. But before going into the life of this man, I will try to present before you the secret of India, what India means. If those whose eyes have been blinded by the glamour of material things, whose whole dedication of life is to eating and drinking and enjoying, whose ideal of possession is lands and gold, whose ideal of pleasure is that of the senses, whose God is money, and whose goal is a life of ease and comfort in this world and death after that, whose minds never look forward, and who rarely think of anything higher than the sense-objects in the midst of which they live — if such as these go to India, what do they see? Poverty, squalor, superstition, darkness, hideousness everywhere. Why? Because in their minds enlightenment means dress, education, social politeness. Whereas occidental nations have used every effort to improve their material position, India has done differently. There live the only men in the world who, in the whole history of humanity, never went beyond their frontiers to conquer anyone, who never coveted that which belonged to anyone else, whose only fault was that their lands were so fertile, and they accumulated wealth by the hard labour of their hands, and so tempted other nations to come and despoil them. They are contented to be despoiled, and to be called barbarians; and in return they want to send to this world visions of the Supreme, to lay bare for the world the secrets of human nature, to rend the veil that conceals the real man, because they know the dream, because they know that behind this materialism lives the real, divine nature of man which no sin can tarnish, no crime can spoil, no lust can taint, which fire cannot burn, nor water wet, which heat cannot dry nor death kill. And to them this true nature of man is as real as is any material object to the senses of an Occidental.

Just as you are brave to jump at the mouth of a cannon with a hurrah, just as you are brave in the name of patriotism to stand up and give up your lives for your country, so are they brave in the name of God. There it is that when a man declares that this is a world of ideas, that it is all a dream, he casts off clothes and property to demonstrate that what he believes and thinks is true. There it is that a man sits on the bank of a river, when he has known that life is eternal, and wants to give up his body just as nothing, just as you can give up a bit of straw. Therein lies their heroism, that they are ready to face death as a brother, because they are convinced that there is no death for them. Therein lies the strength that has made them invincible through hundreds of years of oppression and foreign invasion and tyranny. The nation lives today, and in that nation even in the days of the direst disaster, spiritual giants have, never failed to arise. Asia produces giants in spirituality, just as the Occident produces giants in politics, giants in science. In the beginning of the present century, when Western influence began to pour into India, when Western conquerors, sword in hand, came to demonstrate to the children of the sages that they were mere barbarians, a race of dreamers, that their religion was but mythology, and god and soul and everything they had been struggling for were mere words without meaning, that the thousands of years of struggle, the thousands of years of endless renunciation, had all been in vain, the question began to be agitated among young men at the universities whether the whole national existence up to then had been a failure, whether they must begin anew on the occidental plan, tear up their old books, burn their philosophies, drive away their preachers, and break down their temples. Did not the occidental conqueror, the man who demonstrated his religion with sword and gun, say that all the old ways were mere superstition and idolatry? Children brought up and educated in the new schools started on the occidental plan, drank in these ideas, from their childhood; and it is not to be wondered at that doubts arose. But instead of throwing away superstition and making a real search after truth, the test of truth became, “What does the West say?” The priests must go, the Vedas must be burned, because the West has said so. Out of the feeling of unrest thus produced, there arose a wave of so-called reform in India.

If you wish to be a true reformer, three things are necessary. The first is to feel. Do you really feel for your brothers? Do you really feel that there is so much misery in the world, so much ignorance and superstition? Do you really feel that men are your brothers? Does this idea come into your whole being? Does it run with your blood? Does it tingle in your veins? Does it course through every nerve and filament of your body? Are you full of that idea of sympathy? If you are, that is only the first step. You must think next if you have found any remedy. The old ideas may be all superstition, but in and round these masses of superstition are nuggets of gold and truth. Have you discovered means by which to keep that gold alone, without any of the dross? If you have done that, that is only the second step; one more thing is necessary. What is your motive? Are you sure that you are not actuated by greed of gold, by thirst for fame or power? Are you really sure that you can stand to your ideals and work on, even if the whole world wants to crush you down? Are you sure you know what you want and will perform your duty, and that alone, even if your life is at stake? Are you sure that you will persevere so long as life endures, so long as there is one pulsation left in the heart? Then you are a real reformer, you are a teacher, a Master, a blessing to mankind. But man is so impatient, so short-sighted! He has not the patience to wait, he has not the power to see. He wants to rule, he wants results immediately. Why? He wants to reap the fruits himself, and does not really care for others. Duty for duty’s sake is not what he wants. “To work you have the right, but not to the fruits thereof,” says Krishna. Why cling to results? Ours are the duties. Let the fruits take care of themselves. But man has no patience. He takes up any scheme. The larger number of would-be reformers all over the world can be classed under this heading.

As I have said, the idea of reform came to India when it seemed as if the wave of materialism that had invaded her shores would sweep away the teachings of the sages. But the nation had borne the shocks of a thousand such waves of change. This one was mild in comparison. Wave after wave had flooded the land, breaking and crushing everything for hundreds of years. The sword had flashed, and “Victory unto Allah” had rent the skies of India; but these floods subsided, leaving the national ideals unchanged.

The Indian nation cannot be killed. Deathless it stands, and it will stand so long as that spirit shall remain as the background, so long as her people do not give up their spirituality. Beggars they may remain, poor and poverty-stricken, dirt and squalor may surround them perhaps throughout all time, but let them not give up their God, let them not forget that they are the children of the sages. Just as in the West, even the man in the street wants to trace his descent from some robber-baron of the Middle Ages, so in India, even an Emperor on the throne wants to trace his descent from some beggar-sage in the forest, from a man who wore the bark of a tree, lived upon the fruits of the forest and communed with God. That is the type of descent we want; and so long as holiness is thus supremely venerated, India cannot die.

Many of you perhaps have read the article by Prof. Max Müller in a recent issue of the Nineteenth Century, headed “A Real Mahâtman”. The life of Shri Ramakrishna is interesting, as it was a living illustration of the ideas that he preached. Perhaps it will be a little romantic for you who live in the West in an atmosphere entirely different from that of India. For the methods and manners in the busy rush of life in the West vary entirely from those of India. Yet perhaps it will be of all the more interest for that, because it will bring into a newer light, things about which many have already heard.

It was while reforms of various kinds were being inaugurated in India that a child was born of poor Brâhmin parents on the eighteenth of February, 1836, in one of the remote villages of Bengal. The father and mother were very orthodox people. The life of a really orthodox Brahmin is one of continuous renunciation. Very few things can he do; and over and beyond them the orthodox Brahmin must not occupy himself with any secular business. At the same time he must not receive gifts from everybody. You may imagine how rigorous that life becomes. You have heard of the Brahmins and their priestcraft many times, but very few of you have ever stopped to ask what makes this wonderful band of men the rulers of their fellows. They are the poorest of all the classes in the country; and the secret of their power lies in their renunciation. They never covet wealth. Theirs is the poorest priesthood in the world, and therefore the most powerful. Even in this poverty, a Brahmin’s wife will never allow a poor man to pass through the village without giving him something to eat. That is considered the highest duty of the mother in India; and because she is the mother it is her duty to be served last; she must see that everyone is served before her turn comes. That is why the mother is regarded as God in India. This particular woman, the mother of our subject, was the very type of a Hindu mother. The higher the caste, the greater the restrictions. The lowest caste people can eat and drink anything they like. But as men rise in the social scale, more and more restrictions come; and when they reach the highest caste, the Brahmin, the hereditary priesthood of India, their lives, as I have said, are very much circumscribed. Compared to Western manners, their lives are of continuous asceticism. The Hindus are perhaps the most exclusive nation in the world. They have the same great steadiness as the English, but much more amplified. When they get hold of an idea they carry it out to its very conclusion, and they, keep hold of it generation after generation until they make something out of it. Once give them an idea, and it is not easy to take it back; but it is hard to make them grasp a new idea.

The orthodox Hindus, therefore, are very exclusive, living entirely within their own horizon of thought and feeling. Their lives are laid down in our old books in every little detail, and the least detail is grasped with almost adamantine firmness by them. They would starve rather than eat a meal cooked by the hands of a man not belonging to their own small section of caste. But withal, they have intensity and tremendous earnestness. That force of intense faith and religious life occurs often among the orthodox Hindus, because their very orthodoxy comes from a tremendous conviction that it is right. We may not all think that what they hold on to with such perseverance is right; but to them it is. Now, it is written in our books that a man should always be charitable even to the extreme. If a man starves himself to death to help another man, to save that man’s life, it is all right; it is even held that a man ought to do that. And it is expected of a Brahmin to carry this idea out to the very extreme. Those who are acquainted with the literature of India will remember a beautiful old story about this extreme charity, how a whole family, as related in the Mahâbhârata, starved themselves to death and gave their last meal to a beggar. This is not an exaggeration, for such things still happen. The character of the father and the mother of my Master was very much like that. Very poor they were, and yet many a time the mother would starve herself a whole day to help a poor man. Of them this child was born; and he was a peculiar child from very boyhood. He remembered his past from his birth and was conscious for what purpose he came into the world, and every power was devoted to the fulfilment of that purpose.

While he was quite young, his father died; and the boy was sent to school. A Brahmin’s boy must go to school; the caste restricts him to a learned profession only. The old system of education in India, still prevalent in many parts of the country, especially in connection with Sannyasins, is very different from the modern system. The students had not to pay. It was thought that knowledge is so sacred that no man ought to sell it. Knowledge must be given freely and without any price. The teachers used to take students without charge, and not only so, most of them gave their students food and clothes. To support these teachers the wealthy families on certain occasions, such as a marriage festival, or at the ceremonies for the dead, made gifts to them. They were considered the first and foremost claimants to certain gifts; and they in their turn had to maintain their students. So whenever there is a marriage, especially in a rich family, these professors are invited, and they attend and discuss various subjects. This boy went to one of these gatherings of professors, and the professors were discussing various topics, such as logic or astronomy, subjects much beyond his age. The boy was peculiar, as I have said, and he gathered this moral out of it: “This is the outcome of all their knowledge. Why are they fighting so hard? It is simply for money; the man who can show the highest learning here will get the best pair of cloth, and that is all these people are struggling for. I will not go to school any more.” And he did not; that was the end of his going to school. But this boy had an elder brother, a learned professor, who took him to Calcutta, however, to study with him. After a short time the boy became fully convinced that the aim of all secular learning was mere material advancement, and nothing more, and he resolved to give up study and devote himself solely to the pursuit of spiritual knowledge. The father being dead, the family was very poor; and this boy had to make his own living. He went to a place near Calcutta and became a temple priest. To become a temple priest is thought very degrading to a Brahmin. Our temples are not churches in your sense of the word, they are not places for public worship; for, properly speaking, there is no such thing as public worship in India. Temples are erected mostly by rich persons as a meritorious religious act.

If a man has much property, he wants to build a temple. In that he puts a symbol or an image of an Incarnation of God, and dedicates it to worship in the name of God. The worship is akin to that which is conducted in Roman Catholic churches, very much like the mass, reading certain sentences from the sacred books, waving a light before the image, and treating the image in every respect as we treat a great man. This is all that is done in the temple. The man who goes to a temple is not considered thereby a better man than he who never goes. More properly, the latter is considered the more religious man, for religion in India is to each man his own private affair. In the house of every man there is either a little chapel, or a room set apart, and there he goes morning and evening, sits down in a corner, and there does his worship. And this worship is entirely mental, for another man does not hear or know what he is doing. He sees him only sitting there, and perhaps moving his fingers in a peculiar fashion, or closing his nostrils and breathing in a peculiar manner. Beyond that, he does not know what his brother is doing; even his wife, perhaps, will not know. Thus, all worship is conducted in the privacy of his own home. Those who cannot afford to have a chapel go to the banks of a river, or a lake, or the sea if they live at the seaside, but people sometimes go to worship in a temple by making salutation to the image. There their duty to the temple ends. Therefore, you see, it has been held from the most ancient times in our country, legislated upon by Manu, that it is a degenerating occupation to become a temple priest. Some of the books say it is so degrading as to make a Brahmin worthy of reproach. Just as with education, but in a far more intense sense with religion, there is the other idea behind it that the temple priests who take fees for their work are making merchandise of sacred things. So you may imagine the feelings of that boy when he was forced through poverty to take up the only occupation open to him, that of a temple priest.

There have been various poets in Bengal whose songs have passed down to the people; they are sung in the streets of Calcutta and in every village. Most of these are religious songs, and their one central idea, which is perhaps peculiar to the religions of India, is the idea of realisation. There is not a book in India on religion which does not breathe this idea. Man must realise God, feel God, see God, talk to God. That is religion. The Indian atmosphere is full of stories of saintly persons having visions of God. Such doctrines form the basis of their religion; and all these ancient books and scriptures are the writings of persons who came into direct contact with spiritual facts. These books were not written for the intellect, nor can any reasoning understand them, because they were written by men who saw the things of which they wrote, and they can be understood only by men who have raised themselves to the same height. They say there is such a thing as realisation even in this life, and it is open to everyone, and religion begins with the opening of this faculty, if I may call it so. This is the central idea in all religions, and this is why we may find one man with the most finished oratorical powers, or the most convincing logic, preaching the highest doctrines and yet unable to get people to listen to him, while we may find another, a poor man, who scarcely can speak the language of his own motherland, yet half the nation worships him in his own lifetime as God. When in India the idea somehow or other gets abroad that a man has raised himself to that state of realisation, that religion is no more a matter of conjecture to him, that he is no more groping in the dark in such momentous questions as religion, the immortality of the soul, and God, people come from all quarters to see him and gradually they begin to worship him.

In the temple was an image of the “Blissful Mother”. This boy had to conduct the worship morning and evening, and by degrees this one idea filled his mind: “Is there anything behind this images? Is it true that there is a Mother of Bliss in the universe? Is it true that She lives and guides the universe, or is it all a dream? Is there any reality in religion?”

This scepticism comes to the Hindu child. It is the scepticism of our country: Is this that we are doing real? And theories will not satisfy us, although there are ready at hand almost all the theories that have ever been made with regard to God and soul. Neither books nor theories can satisfy us, the one idea that gets hold of thousands of our people is this idea of realisation. Is it true that there is a God? If it be true, can I see Him? Can I realise the truth? The Western mind may think all this very impracticable, but to us it is intensely practical. For this their lives. You have just heard how from the earliest times there have been persons who have given up all comforts and luxuries to live in caves, and hundreds have given up their homes to weep bitter tears of misery, on the banks of sacred rivers, in order to realise this idea — not to know in the ordinary sense of the word, not intellectual understanding, not a mere rationalistic comprehension of the real thing, not mere groping in the dark, but intense realisation, much more real than this world is to our senses. That is the idea. I do not advance any proposition as to that just now, but that is the one fact that is impressed upon them. Thousands will be killed, other thousands will be ready. So upon this one idea the whole nation for thousands of years have been denying and sacrificing themselves. For this idea thousands of Hindus every year give up their homes, and many of them die through the hardships they have to undergo. To the Western mind this must seem most visionary, and I can see the reason for this point of view. But though I have resided in the West, I still think this idea the most practical thing in life.

Every moment I think of anything else is so much loss to me — even the marvels of earthly sciences; everything is vain if it takes me away from that thought. Life is but momentary, whether you have the knowledge of an angel or the ignorance of an animal. Life is but momentary, whether you have the poverty of the poorest man in rags or the wealth of the richest living person. Life is but momentary, whether you are a downtrodden man living in one of the big streets of the big cities of the West or a crowned Emperor ruling over millions. Life is but momentary, whether you have the best of health or the worst. Life is but momentary, whether you have the most poetical temperament or the most cruel. There is but one solution of life, says the Hindu, and that solution is what they call God and religion. If these be true, life becomes explained, life becomes bearable, becomes enjoyable. Otherwise, life is but a useless burden. That is our idea, but no amount of reasoning can demonstrate it; it can only make it probable, and there it rests. The highest demonstration of reasoning that we have in any branch of knowledge can only make a fact probable, and nothing further. The most demonstrable facts of physical science are only probabilities, not facts yet. Facts are only in the senses. Facts have to be perceived, and we have to perceive religion to demonstrate it to ourselves. We have to sense God to be convinced that there is a God. We must sense the facts of religion to know that they are facts. Nothing else, and no amount of reasoning, but our own perception can make these things real to us, can make my belief firm as a rock. That is my idea, and that is the Indian idea.

This idea took possession of the boy and his whole life became concentrated upon that. Day after day he would weep and say, “Mother, is it true that Thou existest, or is it all poetry? Is the Blissful Mother an imagination of poets and misguided people, or is there such a Reality?” We have seen that of books, of education in our sense of the word, he had none, and so much the more natural, so much the more healthy, was his mind, so much the purer his thoughts, undiluted by drinking in the thoughts of others. Because he did not go to the university, therefore he thought for himself. Because we have spent half our lives in the university we are filled with a collection of other people’s thoughts. Well has Prof. Max Müller said in the article I have just referred to that this was a clean, original man; and the secret of that originality was that he was not brought up within the precincts of a university. However, this thought — whether God can be seen — which was uppermost in his mind gained in strength every day until he could think of nothing else. He could no more conduct the worship properly, could no more attend to the various details in all their minuteness. Often he would forget to place the food-offering before the image, sometimes he would forget to wave the light; at other times he would wave it for hours, and forget everything else.

And that one idea was in his mind every day: “Is it true that Thou existest, O Mother? Why cost Thou not speak? Art Thou dead?” Perhaps some of us here will remember that there are moments in our lives when, tired of all these ratiocinations of dull and dead logic, tired of plodding through books — which after all teach us nothing, become nothing but a sort of intellectual opium-eating — we must have it at stated times or we die — tired with all this, the heart of our hearts sends out a wail: “Is there no one in this universe who can show me the light? If Thou art, show the light unto me. Why dost Thou not speak? Why dost Thou make Thyself so scarce, why send so many Messengers and not Thyself come to me? In this world of fights and factions whom am I to follow and believe? If Thou art the God of every man and woman alike, why comest Thou not to speak to Thy child and see if he is not ready?” Well, to us all come such thoughts in moments of great depression; but such are the temptations surrounding us, that the next moment we forget. For the moment it seemed that the doors of the heavens were going to be opened, for the moment it seemed as if we were going to plunge into the light effulgent; but the animal man again shakes off all these angelic visions. Down we go, animal man once more eating and drinking and dying, and dying and drinking and eating again and again. But there are exceptional minds which are not turned away so easily, which once attracted can never be turned back, whatever may be the temptation in the way, which want to see the Truth knowing that life must go. They say, let it go in a noble conquest, and what conquest is nobler than the conquest of the lower man, than this solution of the problem of life and death, of good and evil?

At last it became impossible for him to serve in the temple. He left it and entered into a little wood that was near and lived there. About this part of his life, he told me many times that he could not tell when the sun rose or set, or how he lived. He lost all thought of himself and forgot to eat. During this period he was lovingly watched over by a relative who put into his mouth food which he mechanically swallowed.

Days and nights thus passed with the boy. When a whole day would pass, towards the evening when the peal of bells in the temples, and the voices singing, would reach the wood, it would make the boy very sad, and he would cry, “Another day is gone in vain, Mother, and Thou hast not come. Another day of this short life has gone, and I have not known the Truth.” In the agony of his soul, sometimes he would rub his face against the ground and weep, and this one prayer burst forth: “Do Thou manifest Thyself in me, Thou Mother of the universe! See that I need Thee and nothing else!” Verily, he wanted to be true to his own ideal. He had heard that the Mother never came until everything had been given up for Her. He had heard that the Mother wanted to come to everyone, but they would not have Her, that people wanted all sorts of foolish little idols to pray to, that they wanted their own enjoyments, and not the Mother, and that the moment they really wanted Her with their whole soul, and nothing else, that moment She would come. So he began to break himself into that idea; he wanted to be exact, even on the plane of matter. He threw away all the little property he had, and took a vow that he would never touch money, and this one idea, “I will not touch money”, became a part of him. It may appear to be something occult, but even in after-life when he was sleeping, if I touched him with a piece of money his hand would become bent, and his whole body would become, as it were, paralysed. The other idea that came into his mind was that lust was the other enemy. Man is a soul, and soul is sexless, neither man nor woman. The idea of sex and the idea of money were the two things, he thought, that prevented him from seeing the Mother. This whole universe is the manifestation of the Mother, and She lives in every woman’s body. “Every woman represents the Mother; how can I think of woman in mere sex relation?” That was the idea: Every woman was his Mother, he must bring himself to the state when he would see nothing but Mother in every woman. And he carried it out in his life.

This is the tremendous thirst that seizes the human heart. Later on, this very man said to me, “My child, suppose there is a bag of gold in one room, and a robber in the next room; do you think that the robber can sleep? He cannot. His mind will be always thinking how to get into that room and obtain possession of that gold. Do you think then that a man, firmly persuaded that there is a Reality behind all these appearances, that there is a God, that there is One who never dies, One who is infinite bliss, a bliss compared with which these pleasures of the senses are simply playthings, can rest contented without struggling to attain It? Can he cease his efforts for a moment? No. He will become mad with longing.” This divine madness seized the boy. At that time he had no teacher, nobody to tell him anything, and everyone thought that he was out of his mind. This is the ordinary condition of things. If a man throws aside the vanities of the world, we hear him called mad. But such men are the salt of the earth. Out of such madness have come the powers that have moved this world of ours, and out of such madness alone will come the powers of the future that are going to move the world.

So days, weeks, months passed in continuous struggle of the soul to arrive at truth. The boy began to see visions, to see wonderful things; the secrets of his nature were beginning to open to him. Veil after veil was, as it were, being taken off. Mother Herself became the teacher and initiated the boy into the truths he sought. At this time there came to this place a woman of beautiful appearance, learned beyond compare. Later on, this saint used to say about her that she was not learned, but was the embodiment of learning; she was learning itself, in human form. There, too, you find the peculiarity of the Indian nation. In the midst of the ignorance in which the average Hindu woman lives, in the midst of what is called in Western countries her lack of freedom, there could arise a woman of supreme spirituality. She was a Sannyâsini; for women also give up the world, throw away their property, do not marry, and devote themselves to the worship of the Lord. She came; and when she heard of this boy in the grove, she offered to go and see him; and hers was the first help he received. At once she recognised what his trouble was, and she said to him. “My son blessed is the man upon whom such madness comes. The whole of this universe is mad — some for wealth, some for pleasure, some for fame, some for a hundred other things. They are mad for gold, or husbands, or wives, for little trifles, mad to tyrannise over somebody, mad to become rich, mad for every foolish thing except God. And they can understand only their own madness. When another man is mad after gold, they have fellow-feeling and sympathy for him, and they say he is the right man, as lunatics think that lunatics alone are sane. But if a man is mad after the Beloved, after the Lord, how can they understand? They think he has gone crazy; and they say, ‘Have nothing to do with him.’ That is why they call you mad; but yours is the right kind of madness. Blessed is the man who is mad after God. Such men are very few.” This woman remained near the boy for years, taught him the forms of the religions of India, initiated him into the different practices of Yoga, and, as it were, guided and brought into harmony this tremendous river of spirituality.

Later, there came to the same grove a Sannyasin, one of the begging friars of India, a learned man, a philosopher. He was a peculiar man, he was an idealist. He did not believe that this world existed in reality; and to demonstrate that, he would never go under a roof, he would always live out of doors, in storm and sunshine alike. This man began to teach the boy the philosophy of the Vedas; and he found very soon, to his astonishment, that the pupil was in some respects wiser than the master. He spent several months with the boy, after which he initiated him into the order of Sannyasins, and took his departure.

When as a temple priest his extraordinary worship made people think him deranged in his head, his relatives took him home and married him to a little girl, thinking that that would turn his thoughts and restore the balance of his mind. But he came back and, as we have seen, merged deeper in his madness. Sometimes, in our country, boys are married as children and have no voice in the matter; their parents marry them. Of course such a marriage is little more than a betrothal. When they are married they still continue to live with their parents, and the real marriage takes place when the wife grows older, Then it is customary for the husband to go and bring his bride to his own home. In this case, however, the husband had entirely forgotten that he had a wife. In her far off home the girl had heard that her husband had become a religious enthusiast, and that he was even considered insane by many. She resolved to learn the truth for herself, so she set out and walked to the place where her husband was. When at last she stood in her husband’s presence, he at once admitted her right to his life, although in India any person, man or woman, who embraces a religious life, is thereby freed from all other obligations. The young man fell at the feet of his wife and said, “As for me, the Mother has shown me that She resides in every woman, and so I have learnt to look upon every woman as Mother. That is the one idea I can have about you; but if you wish to drag me into the world, as I have been married to you, I am at your service.”

The maiden was a pure and noble soul and was able to understand her husband’s aspirations and sympathise with them. She quickly told him that she had no wish to drag him down to a life of worldliness; but that all she desired was to remain near him, to serve him, and to learn of him. She became one of his most devoted disciples, always revering him as a divine being. Thus through his wife’s consent the last barrier was removed, and he was free to lead the life he had chosen.

The next desire that seized upon the soul of this man as to know the truth about the various religions. Up to that time he had not known any religion but his own. He wanted to understand what other religions were like. So he sought teachers of other religions. By teachers you must always remember what we mean in India, not a bookworm, but a man of realisation, one who knows truth a; first hand and not through an intermediary. He found a Mohammedan saint and placed himself under him; he underwent the disciplines prescribed by him, and to his astonishment found that when faithfully carried out, these devotional methods led him to the same goal he had already attained. He gathered similar experience from following the true religion of Jesus the Christ. He went to all the sects he could find, and whatever he took up he went into with his whole heart. He did exactly as he was told, and in every instance he arrived at the same result. Thus from actual experience, he came to know that the goal of every religion is the same, that each is trying to teach the same thing, the difference being largely in method and still more in language. At the core, all sects and all religions have the same aim; and they were only quarrelling for their own selfish purposes — they were not anxious about the truth, but about “my name” and “your name”. Two of them preached the same truth, but one of them said, “That cannot be true, because I have not put upon it the seal of my name. Therefore do not listen to him.” And the other man said, “Do not hear him, although he is preaching very much the same thing, yet it is not true because he does not preach it in my name.”

That is what my Master found, and he then set about to learn humility, because he had found that the one idea in all religions is, “not me, but Thou”, and he who says, “not me”, the Lord fills his heart. The less of this little “I” the more of God there is in him. That he found to be the truth in every religion in the world, and he set himself to accomplish this. As I have told you, whenever he wanted to do anything he never confined himself to fine theories, but would enter into the practice immediately; We see many persons talking the most wonderfully fine things about charity and about equality and the rights of other people and all that, but it is only in theory. I was so fortunate as to find one who was able to carry theory into practice. He had the most wonderful faculty of carrying everything into practice which he thought was right.

Now, there was a family of Pariahs living near the place. The Pariahs number several millions in the whole of India and are a sect of people so low that some of our books say that if a Brahmin coming out from his house sees the face of a Pariah, he has to fast that day and recite certain prayers before he becomes holy again. In some Hindu cities when a Pariah enters, he has to put a crow’s feather on his head as a sign that he is a Pariah, and he has to cry aloud, “Save yourselves, the Pariah is passing through the street”, and you will find people flying off from him as if by magic, because if they touch him by chance, they will have to change their clothes, bathe, and do other things. And the Pariah for thousands of years has believed that it is perfectly right; that his touch will make everybody unholy. Now my Master would go to a Pariah and ask to be allowed to clean his house. The business of the Pariah is to clean the streets of the cities and to keep houses clean. He cannot enter the house by the front door; by the back door he enters; and as soon as he has gone, the whole place over which he has passed is sprinkled with and made holy by a little Gangâ water. By birth the Brahmin stands for holiness, and the Pariah for the very reverse. And this Brahmin asked to be allowed to do the menial services in the house of the Pariah. The Pariah of course could not allow that, for they all think that if they allow a Brahmin to do such menial work it will be an awful sin, and they will become extinct. The Pariah would not permit it; so in the dead of night, when all were sleeping, Ramakrishna would enter the house. He had long hair, and with his hair he would wipe the place, saying, “Oh, my Mother, make me the servant of the Pariah, make me feel that I am even lower than the Pariah.” “They worship Me best who worship My worshippers. These are all My children and your privilege is to serve them” — is the teaching of Hindu scriptures.

There were various other preparations which would take a long time to relate, and I want to give you just a sketch of his life. For years he thus educated himself. One of the Sâdhanâs was to root out the sex idea. Soul has no sex, it is neither male nor female. It is only in the body that sex exists, and the man who desires to reach the spirit cannot at the same time hold to sex distinctions. Having been born in a masculine body, this man wanted to bring the feminine idea into everything. He began to think that he was a woman, he dressed like a woman, spoke like a woman, gave up the occupations of men, and lived in the household among the women of a good family, until, after years of this discipline, his mind became changed, and he entirely forgot the idea of sex; thus the whole view of life became changed to him.

We hear in the West about worshipping woman, but this is usually for her youth and beauty. This man meant by worshipping woman, that to him every woman’s face was that of the Blissful Mother, and nothing but that. I myself have seen this man standing before those women whom society would not touch, and falling at their feet bathed in tears, saying, “Mother, in one form Thou art in the street, and in another form Thou art the universe. I salute Thee, Mother, I salute Thee.” Think of the blessedness of that life from which all carnality has vanished, which can look upon every woman with that love and reverence when every woman’s face becomes transfigured, and only the face of the Divine Mother, the Blissful One, the Protectress of the human race, shines upon it! That is what we want. Do you mean to say that the divinity back of a woman can ever be cheated? It never was and never will be, It always asserts itself. Unfailingly it detects fraud, it detects hypocrisy, unerringly it feels the warmth of truth, the light of spirituality, the holiness of purity. Such purity is absolutely necessary if real spirituality is to be attained.

This rigorous, unsullied purity came into the life of that man. All the struggles which we have in our lives were past for him. His hard-earned jewels of spirituality, for which he had given three-quarters of his life, were now ready to be given to humanity, and then began his mission. His teaching and preaching were peculiar. In our country a teacher is a most highly venerated person, he is regarded as God Himself. We have not even the same respect for our father and mother. Father and mother give us our body, but the teacher shows us the way to salvation. We are his children, we are born in the spiritual line of the teacher. All Hindus come to pay respect to an extraordinary teacher, they crowd around him. And here was such a teacher, but the teacher had no thought whether he was to be respected or not, he had not the least idea that he was a great teacher, he thought that it was Mother who was doing everything and not he. He always said, “If any good comes from my lips, it is the Mother who speaks; what have I to do with it?” That was his one idea about his work, and to the day of his death he never gave it up. This man sought no one. His principle was, first form character, first earn spirituality and results will come of themselves. His favourite illustration was, “When the lotus opens, the bees come of their own accord to seek the honey; so let the lotus of your character be full-blown, and the results will follow.” This is a great lesson to learn.

My Master taught me this lesson hundreds of times, yet I often forget it. Few understand the power of thought. If a man goes into a cave, shuts himself in, and thinks one really great thought and dies, that thought will penetrate the walls of that cave, vibrate through space, and at last permeate the whole human race. Such is the power of thought; be in no hurry therefore to give your thoughts to others. First have something to give. He alone teaches who has something to give, for teaching is not talking, teaching is not imparting doctrines, it is communicating. Spirituality can be communicated just as really as I can give you a flower. This is true in the most literal sense. This idea is very old in India and finds illustration in the West in the “theory, in the belief, of apostolic succession. Therefore first make character — that is the highest duty you can perform. Know Truth for yourself, and there will be many to whom you can teach it after wards; they will all come. This was the attitude of nay Master. He criticised no one. For years I lived with that man, but never did I hear those lips utter one word of condemnation for any sect. He had the same sympathy for all sects; he had found the harmony between them. A man may be intellectual, or devotional, or mystic, or active; the various religions represent one or the other of these types. Yet it is possible to combine all the four in one man, and this is what future humanity is going to do. That was his idea. He condemned no one, but saw the good in all.

People came by thousands to see and hear this wonderful man who spoke in a patois every word of which was forceful and instinct with light. For it is not what is spoken, much less the language in which it is spoken, but it is the personality of the speaker which dwells in everything he says that carries weight. Every one of us feels this at times. We hear most splendid orations, most wonderfully reasoned-out discourses, and we go home and forget them all. At other times we hear a few words in the simplest language, and they enter into our lives, become part and parcel of ourselves and produce lasting results. The words of a man who can put his personality into them take effect, but he must have tremendous personality. All teaching implies giving and taking, the teacher gives and the taught receives, but the one must have something to give, and the other must be open to receive.

This man came to live near Calcutta, the capital of India, the most important university town in our country which was sending out sceptics and materialists by the hundreds every year. Yet many of these university men — sceptics and agnostics — used to come and listen to him. I heard of this man, and I went to hear him. He looked just like an ordinary man, with nothing remarkable about him. He used the most simple language, and I thought “Can this man be a great teacher?”— crept near to him and asked him the question which I had been asking others all my life: “Do you believe in God, Sir?” “Yes,” he replied. “Can you prove it, Sir?” “Yes.” “How?” “Because I see Him just as I see you here, only in a much intenser sense.” That impressed me at once. For the first time I found a man who dared to say that he saw God that religion was a reality to be felt, to be sensed in an infinitely more intense way than we can sense the world. I began to go to that man, day after day, and I actually saw that religion could be given. One touch, one glance, can change a whole life. I have read about Buddha and Christ and Mohammed, about all those different luminaries of ancient times, how they would stand up and say, “Be thou whole”, and the man became whole. I now found it to be true, and when I myself saw this man, all scepticism was brushed aside. It could be done; and my Master used to say, “Religion can be given and taken more tangibly, more really than anything else in the world.” Be therefore spiritual first; have something to give and then stand before the world and give it. Religion is not talk, or doctrines, or theories; nor is it sectarianism. Religion cannot live in sects and societies. It is the relation between the soul and God; how can it be made into a society? It would then degenerate into business, and wherever there are business and business principles in religion, spirituality dies. Religion does not consist in erecting temples, or building churches, or attending public worship. It is not to be found in books, or in words, or in lectures, or in organisations. Religion consists in realisation. As a fact, we all know that nothing will satisfy us until we know the truth for ourselves. However we may argue, however much we may hear, but one thing will satisfy us, and that is our own realisation; and such an experience is possible for every one of us if we will only try. The first ideal of this attempt to realise religion is that of renunciation. As far as we can, we must give up. Darkness and light, enjoyment of the world and enjoyment of God will never go together. “Ye cannot serve God and Mammon.” Let people try it if they will, and I have seen millions in every country who have tried; but after all, it comes to nothing. If one word remains true in the saying, it is, give up every thing for the sake of the Lord. This is a hard and long task, but you can begin it here and now. Bit by bit we must go towards it.

The second idea that I learnt from my Master, and which is perhaps the most vital, is the wonderful truth that the religions of the world are not contradictory or antagonistic. They are but various phases of one eternal religion. That one eternal religion is applied to different planes of existence, is applied to the opinions of various minds and various races. There never was my religion or yours, my national religion or your national religion; there never existed many religions, there is only the one. One infinite religion existed all through eternity and will ever exist, and this religion is expressing itself in various countries in various ways. Therefore we must respect all religions and we must try to accept them all as far as we can. Religions manifest themselves not only according to race and geographical position, but according to individual powers. In one man religion is manifesting itself as intense activity, as work. In another it is manifesting itself as intense devotion, in yet another, as mysticism, in others as philosophy, and so forth. It is wrong when we say to others, “Your methods are not right.” Perhaps a man, whose nature is that of love, thinks that the man who does good to others is not on the right road to religion, because it is not his own way, and is therefore wrong. If the philosopher thinks, “Oh, the poor ignorant people, what do they know about a God of Love, and loving Him? They do not know what they mean,” he is wrong, because they may be right and he also.

To learn this central secret that the truth may be one and yet many at the same time, that we may have different visions of the same truth from different standpoints, is exactly what must be done. Then, instead of antagonism to anyone, we shall have infinite sympathy with all. Knowing that as long as there are different natures born in this world, the same religious truth will require different adaptations, we shall understand that we are bound to have forbearance with each other. Just as nature is unity in variety — an infinite variation in the phenomenal — as in and through all these variations of the phenomenal runs the Infinite, the Unchangeable, the Absolute Unity, so it is with every man; the microcosm is but a miniature repetition of the macrocosm; in spite of all these variations, in and through them all runs this eternal harmony, and we have to recognise this. This idea, above all other ideas, I find to be the crying necessity of the day. Coming from a country which is a hotbed of religious sects — and to which, through its good fortune or ill fortune, everyone who has a religious idea wants to send an advance-guard — I have been acquainted from my childhood with the various sects of the world. Even the Mormons come to preach in India. Welcome them all! That is the soil on which to preach religion. There it takes root more than in any other country. If you come and teach politics to the Hindus, they do not understand; but if you come to preach religion, however curious it may be, you will have hundreds and thousands of followers in no time, and you have every chance of becoming a living God in your lifetime. I am glad it is so, it is the one thing we want in India.

The sects among the Hindus are various, a great many in number, and some of them apparently hopelessly contradictory. Yet they all tell you they are but different manifestations of religion. “As different rivers, taking their start from different mountains, running crooked or straight, all come and mingle their waters in the ocean, so the different sects, with their different points of vied, at last all come unto Thee.” This is not a theory, it has to be recognised, but not in that patronising way which we see with some people: “Oh yes, there are some very good things in it. These are what we call the ethnical religions. These ethnical religions have some good in them.” Some even have the most wonderfully liberal idea that other religions are all little bits of a prehistoric evolution, but “ours is the fulfilment of things”. One man says, because his is the oldest religion, it is the best: another makes the same claim, because his is the latest.

We have to recognise that each one of them has the same saving power as the other. What you have heard about their difference, whether in the temple or in the church, is a mass of superstition. The same God answers all; and it is not you, or I, or any body of men that is responsible for the safety and salvation of the least little bit of the soul; the same Almighty God is responsible for all. I do not understand how people declare themselves to be believers in God, and at the same time think that God has handed over to a little body of men all truth, and that they are the guardians of the rest of humanity. How can you call that religion? Religion is realisation; but mere talk — mere trying to believe, mere groping in darkness, mere parroting the words of ancestors and thinking it is religion, mere making a political something out of the truths of religion — is not religion at all. In every sect — even among the Mohammedans whom we always regard as the most exclusive — even among them we find that wherever there was a man trying to realise religion, from his lips have come the fiery words: “Thou art the Lord of all, Thou art in the heart of all, Thou art the guide of all, Thou art the Teacher of all, and Thou caress infinitely more for the land of Thy children than we can ever do.” Do not try to disturb the faith of any man. If you can, give him something better; if you can, get hold of a man where he stands and give him a push upwards; do so, but do not destroy what he has. The only true teacher is he who can convert himself, as it were, into a thousand persons at a moment’s notice. The only true teacher is he who can immediately come down to the level of the student, and transfer his soul to the student’s soul and see through the student’s eyes and hear through his ears and understand through his mind. Such a teacher can really teach and none else. All these negative, breaking-down, destructive teachers that are in the world can never do any good.

In the presence of my Master I found out that man could be perfect, even in this body. Those lips never cursed anyone, never even criticised anyone. Those eyes were beyond the possibility of seeing evil, that mind had lost the power of thinking evil. He saw nothing but good. That tremendous purity, that tremendous renunciation is the one secret of spirituality. “Neither through wealth, nor through progeny, but through renunciation alone, is immortality to be reached”, say the Vedas. “Sell all that thou hast and give to the poor, and follow me”, says the Christ. So all great saints and Prophets have expressed it, and have carried it out in their lives. How can great spirituality come without that renunciation? Renunciation is the background of all religious thought wherever it be, and you will always find that as this idea of renunciation lessens, the more will the senses creep into the field of religion, and spirituality will decrease in the same ratio.

That man was the embodiment of renunciation. In our country it is necessary for a man who becomes a Sannyasin to give up all worldly wealth and position, and this my Master carried out literally. There were many who would have felt themselves blest if he would only have accepted a present from their hands, who would gladly have given him thousands of rupees if he would have taken them, but these were the only men from whom he would turn away. He was a triumphant example, a living realisation of the complete conquest of lust and of desire for money. He was beyond all ideas of either, and such men are necessary for this century. Such renunciation is necessary in these days when men have begun to think that they cannot live a month without what they call their “necessities”, and which they are increasing out of all proportion. It is necessary in a time like this that a man should arise to demonstrate to the sceptics of the world that there yet breathes a man who does not care a straw for all the gold or all the fame that is in the universe. Yet there are such men.

The other idea of his life was intense love for others. The first part of my Master’s life was spent in acquiring spirituality, and the remaining years in distributing it. People in our country have not the same customs as you have in visiting a religious teacher or a Sannyasin. Somebody would come to ask him about something, some perhaps would come hundreds of miles, walking all the way, just to ask one question, to hear one word from him, “Tell me one word for my salvation.” That is the way they come. They come in numbers, unceremoniously, to the place where he is mostly to be found; they may find him under a tree and question him; and before one set of people has gone, others have arrived. So if a man is greatly revered, he will sometimes have no rest day or night. He will have to talk constantly. For hours people will come pouring in, and this man will be teaching them.

So men came in crowds to hear him, and he would talk twenty hours in the twenty-four, and that not for one day, but for months and months until at last the body broke down under the pressure of this tremendous strain. His intense love for mankind would not let him refuse to help even the humblest of the thousands who sought his aid. Gradually, there developed a vital throat disorder and yet he could not be persuaded to refrain from these exertions. As soon as he heard that people were asking to see him, he would insist upon having them admitted and would answer all their questions. When expostulated with, he replied, “I do not care. I will give up twenty thousand such bodies to help one man. It is glorious to help even one man.” There was no rest for him. Once a man asked him, “Sir, you are a great Yogi. Why do you not put your mind a little on your body and cure your disease? “At first he did not answer, but when the question had been repeated, he gently said, “My friend, I thought you were a sage, but you talk like other men of the world. This mind has been given to the Lord. Do you mean to say that I should take it back and put it upon the body which is but a mere cage of the soul?”

So he went on preaching to the people, and the news spread that his body was about to pass away, and the people began to flock to him in greater crowds than ever. You cannot imagine the way they come to these great religious teachers in India, how they crowd round them and make gods of them while they are yet living. Thousands wait simply to touch the hem of their garments. It is through this appreciation of spirituality in others that spirituality is produced. Whatever man wants and appreciates, he will get; and it is the same with nations. If you go to India and deliver a political lecture, however grand it may be, you will scarcely find people to listen to you but just go and teach religion, live it, not merely talk it, and hundreds will crowd just to look at you, to touch your feet. When the people heard that this holy man was likely to go from them soon, they began to come round him more than ever, and my Master went on teaching them without the least regard for his health. We could not prevent this. Many of the people came from long distances, and he would not rest until he had answered their questions. “While I can speak, I must teach them,” he would say, and he was as good as his word. One day, he told us that he would lay down the body that day, and repeating the most sacred word of the Vedas he entered into Samâdhi and passed away.

His thoughts and his message were known to very few capable of giving them out. Among others, he left a few young boys who had renounced the world, and were ready to carry on his work. Attempts were made to crush them. But they stood firm, having the inspiration of that great life before them. Having had the contact of that blessed life for years, they stood their ground. These young men, living as Sannyasins, begged through the streets of the city where they were born, although some of them came from high families. At first they met with great antagonism, but they persevered and went on from day to day spreading all over India the message of that great man, until the whole country was filled with the ideas he had preached. This man, from a remote village of Bengal, without education, by the sheer force of his own determination, realised the truth and gave it to others, leaving only a few young boys to keep it alive.

Today the name of Shri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa is known all over India to its millions of people. Nay, the power of that man has spread beyond India; and if there has ever been a word of truth, a word of spirituality, that I have spoken anywhere in the world, I owe it to my Master; only the mistakes are mine.

This is the message of Shri Ramakrishna to the modern world: “Do not care for doctrines, do not care for dogmas, or sects, or churches, or temples; they count for little compared with the essence of existence in each man which is spirituality; and the more this is developed in a man, the more powerful is he for good. Earn that first, acquire that, and criticise no one, for all doctrines and creeds have some good in them. Show by your lives that religion does not mean words, or names, or sects, but that it means spiritual realisation. Only those can understand who have felt. Only those who have attained to spirituality can communicate it to others, can be great teachers of mankind. They alone are the powers of light.”

The more such men are produced in a country, the more that country will be raised; and that country where such men absolutely do not exist is simply doomed nothing can save it. Therefore my Master’s message to mankind is: “Be spiritual and realise truth for Yourself.” He would have you give up for the sake of your fellow-beings. He would have you cease talking about love for your brother, and set to work to prove your words. The time has come for renunciation, for realisation, and then you will see the harmony in all the religions of the world. You will know that there is no need of any quarrel. And then only will you be ready to help humanity. To proclaim and make clear the fundamental unity underlying all religions was the mission of my Master. Other teachers have taught special religions which bear their names, but this great teacher of the nineteenth century made no claim for himself. He left every religion undisturbed because he had realised that in reality they are all part and parcel of the one eternal religion.


फ़रवरी 18, 2012 Posted by | चरित्र, सामायिक टिपण्णी, English Posts | , , , , , , , , , | 3 टिप्पणियाँ

Constitutional Introspection on Republic Day

”We, the people of India that is Bharat, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a sovereign, democratic republic. …” the preamble of Indian Constitution began like this on 26th of Nov 1949 when the draft was finalized and enacted and then adopted on the 26th January 1950 which we all celebrate every year as Republic Day. It has undergone 115 amendments in last 62 years. But otherwise it has stood the test of time by surviving in the unique challenges posed by the largest and certainly most complex democracies of the world today. The most controversial of these amendments was the 42nd amendment which ushered in the darkest periods of our recent history called, Emergency. The other sibling of the midnight delivery had seen much more turbulence and a large measure of Marshall Law. The notorious neighbour has spent more years in autocracy than in democracy in its fragile existence. 2 years of emergency is the Indian experience of the political autocracy. This very amendment which suspended all the fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution also altered the basic nature of the constitution by strangely amending its preamble to add two more adjectives, namely socialist and secular.

India after 25 years of its constitution as a republic was now a sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic Republic. Nothing was changed in the main body of the constitution to match these adjectives. The other portions of the 42nd amendments were to give the autocratic power to the executive by suspending the fundamental rights of the citizens. This act in itself was neither socialist nor secular. Thus logically the amendment accepted that the constitution in its originality was secular and socialist enough that it did not need any modification to suit the additions in preamble. The funniest part of this exercise is that after the end of Indira Rule and Janta Party coming in power the emergency provisions were removed from the constitution by the 44th amendment but the additions to the preamble were left untouched. Thus endorsing the enhanced emphasis on the socialist and secular nature of the constitution.

Though there are no changes in the original provisions, in practice secularism is being unnecessarily pronounced in all the governmental actions. The political parties for their petty electoral benefit tend to appeasement of so called minorities in the name of secularism. Secularism is used to denigrate everything traditional and Hindu in origin. The famous instance of the controversy over Saraswati Puja in the convention of education ministers during the NDA rule started by the objection raised by a few politicians. The issue was raised under the garb of secularism. Media gave great publicity to the issue. No one bothered to check the constitutionality of the claim. Recently the issue of Ayud Puja and Sarasavati Puja was raised before the Madras high court in a PIL. The high court has rejected the contention that performing Puja in the offices is against the secular nature of the government. “Showing respect to the place of work and the objects of work will in no way offend the feelings of others or affect secularism. Ayudha Puja is referable to prayer, reverence or respect given to objects through which an individual performs his profession or occupation. Ayudha Puja in its real terms transcends all religion,” a division bench of Justice R Sudhakar and Justice Aruna Jagadeesan has said. This should make the constitutional position clear on the issue. The practice of the media and intellectuals is very pathetic on this issue as it was well demonstrated by the Jaipur Lit fare issue. Even though on his very channel every representative of Islam from Lakhnau to Hyderabad was vociferously demanding that Sulman Rushdie should not be allowed to come to India, the star anchor Arnab Goswami kept on saying fringe elements of the Muslim society are opposed. This is the way the faulty concept of secularism corroborated by another unfounded concept of minority has developed into a divisive element in the constitutional discourse.

Socialism is very hard to define. But it can be said without slightest of doubt that the Indian state in last two decades has abandoned socialism as an economic policy. From 1991 we claim to have tried to follow the liberal free market economics. But according to the constitution India is still a Socialist Republic.

On the occasion of the 63rd Republic day we must introspect on the functioning of our constitution in the present scenario. We need not go far for the parameters on which to do the self evaluation. The preamble of the constitution puts forth the goals to be achieved by the independent Indian Republic. It proclaims ”…. and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship; EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;”

After 6 decades it definitely is a time to evaluate the performance of constitutional framework in light of the goals it had set before itself. Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity are the lofty ideas we had kept before us to put them in practice by implementing the provisions of the Constitution. It demands a detailed study of all the parameters and an objective comparison with the bottom-line from where we started. We would definitely try to do some such attempts in the coming months with the available data from the open sources. But even without the benefit of such detailed statistical study one can say without any fear of serious opposition from any quarter of the civil society or even the government, that we have not been successful to ensure any of these lofty ideals to all our citizens. In fact we will hardly find any section of the society satisfied enough to concede that all these constitutional promises have been fulfilled.

This total despondency should not be taken lightly. A large number of citizens are totally dissatisfied. Many of them have given up hope of any change. Some have taken extreme measures falling pray to the devious design of the antinational forces in their desperation. The spreading Red terror and other separatist movements in many parts of the country are the result of this desperation and hopelessness. The more civil of the disappointed citizenry have also taken up to the democratic form of protests. The number of protests and the response they yielded last year is an eye-opener for the patriots in the country. It is not a good sign that the educated, well off middle class urban population has lost faith in the political and constitutional mechanism for change in the system and in this cynical desperation are ready to come to the streets and demonstrate their anger and cry for reform. This depicts the total failure of governance. The loss of faith of the population in the government’s conflict redressal mechanism is the most dangerous bane of Democracy.

In this background it is urgent that we take stock of things as they stand. We must be ready to face that we need basic change of approach. The system based on the colonial experience has worked fine for these 6 decades. But the whole paradigm within the country and at the Global level has changed. In 1950 we were a nation trying to rebuild on the ruins of the colonial Raj. The economic situation was pathetic. The confidence level of the masses individually and collectively was not very high. It was time for survival and reconstruction. But today the Global leaders are falling on the economic front. India is being seen as an upcoming power at economic and geopolitical level by the whole world. The most discouraging analysts put us as a regional power and more optimistic claim that India has a Global role to play. More importantly the youth has a confidence that they can achieve anything in India. Whatever is possible in any other part of the world is achievable by us. We have shown it practically in the fields of science and technology, communications, finances, space technology and many more. The national belief in its capacity is not reflected in the state machinery. The government does not exude this confidence shown by the society. The policies framed by the government still smack of the stink of olden days of begging and struggle for survival. This psychological dichotomy between the state and the nation is the cause of all the cynical despondency. The state has to come up to the level and expectations of the awakened India.

This strange mixture of strength and vulnerability is the reality of Indian Republic on the eve of its 63rd Republic day celebration. We need to have a fresh constitutional structure to meet this unique situation in the Indian History. This is a very important window of opportunity for the great and the most ancient nation of the whole world. This is the moment when the destiny of not only 1/6th of the world’s population but the whole world will be decided. We need gear ourselves up for the occasion. The first important step can be constitutional review. In fact it should be afresh constitutional drafting exercise. This time we must take the vast and deep Historical and philosophical experience of Bharat in to account. The constitution must be indigenous. Based in the cultural ethos of the people of Bharat.

We, the people of Bharat must come together to give unto ourselves a real Bharatiya Constitution. Let this be our resolve this Republic Day.

जनवरी 25, 2012 Posted by | सामायिक टिपण्णी, English Posts | , , , , , , , , , | टिप्पणी करे

Fractured Democracy : Demands Surgery

People’s power was amply exhibited in different protests in the year 2011. In a democratic setup public opinion is very important factor in policy making. Hence there is always a concerted effort on the part of the establishment to mange the public perception. With the explosion of media of mass communication this task has become more and more specialized. Print media has its own influence in the class of people in the polpulation but the spread of electronic channels and then the sudden explosion of social media has given the masses multiple avenues to express there opinion. The first two are influenced by the government by spending enormous amounts on advertisements. But the internet being an open forum without much financial involvement it is very difficult for the governments all over the world to effectively control this.

Professional perception managers are employed to meet this unprecedented challenge. The art and science has been developing gin the developed countries for more than decade now but we are experimenting with this in last couple of years. This government is learnt to have used most expensive professionals available in the field. It was reported in some news papers that these agencies have been advising the prince of the ruling party on matters like how to dress? How to speak? How to pick up a child at appropriate moment to be photographed etc. Same report claimed that the couple of day’s growth seen on the face is also a planned move suggested by PMs –Perception managers. On a more serious stage an example of effective perception management was the Mumbai fast of Anna. It was reversal of perceptions that worked against India Against Corruption. Earlier IAC had successfully created a perception (without any professional help) that Janalokpal is the key to all the problems related to Governance. The central government very cleverly managed to put forth that they have come up with Lokpal. May not be copycat of JLP but nevertheless a Lokpal is here. This created an overwhelming impression in the public mind that Mumbai fast is just an ego boosting exercise. Hence we did not see the response as before. It was naive on the part of team Anna to think that they are in an honest fight. They proved to be politically immature to match the choreography of the political managers of the government. Basically Bharatiya Public wants to believe in the Rule of law. They tend to follow the government even if little less than perfect. Agitation is only an extreme measure. The UPA had failed to give this room for an alternative earlier in April and August. After the 4th June crack down on the peaceful gathering of fasting protestors including women and children in the Ramlila grounds created an out rage. Public felt cornered hence the agitations got mass support. This time around the government was successful in creating a perception that the effort is on and there are parties like TMC apart from the opposition who are grinding the Govt for strong Lokpal, hence no need for extracurricular measures. This is most typical how Bharat works.

There is another extreme in the discourse. They claim that the system and not the governing group are responsible for the mess. The Democratic set-up adopted by Bharat is the root cause of all the problems. Even the team Anna members criticized the practice MPs following the party line. They demanded removing the provision of whip so that individuals can vote in the parliament according to their own thinking. This is height of duplicity. On one hand we are talking about people’s right to recall and on the other we want the MPs not to follow party discipline. The legal provisions of whip were strengthened by anti defection law after the repeated horse-trading episodes in the 1980s. An MP is elected on the party symbol. It is not his individual win. The party policy is projected to the public in the election; they are supposed to have voted accordingly. To claim that the individual will be in a better position to take moral position than within the party mandate may open flood gates for more dangerous corruption in the houses of Parliament. In fact the present irony of coalitions is also a great drama of our flawed democracy. The parties which fought against each other in the election come together and form the government. On one hand at the central level support of parties is bought by CBI threats or relaxations, on the other hand the same parties are target of vicious campaign at the State level.

But can we blame Democracy for all this? Contention that Democracy is the root cause of all the evil does not hold good in an objective analysis. Any other alternative will be inherently more prone to dishonesty and exploitation. Democracy as such at least notionally has the potential of generating people’s power as witnessed in the “Samagra Kranti” led by Jaiprakash Narain in 1977 and again during the Ayodhya agitation in 1992. The same was done apolitically last year. We can definitely infer that present form of democracy has created systemic faults that are responsible for the failure of governance mechanism in the country today. But to say that per say Democracy need to be negated does not go with the times. We will have to win the game by following the rules of the game. Reforms are no doubt needed in our democratic system. But we will have to demand reforms in accordance with the evolved system and not totally out of box.

Theoretically speaking, there are two forms of practicing Democracy. A > Direct Democracy – This is said to be practiced in the city states of Athens or some of the Ganas in the northern Bharat at the time of Alexander’s attack. The citizens directly participate in the governance process in legislature and they elect the executive, even the Judiciary in some cases.

B> Representative Democracy- The Westminster model that we have adopted as a legacy of British Raj. In this the representatives are elected by the citizens and they in turn ‘choose’ the Executive. Mostly the Judiciary is not elected but selected.

Both the models have their pros and cons. US has hybridized the two systems. It has direct elections for the executive heads in the states as well as at the Federal level. At the same time there is a representative houses for legislation primarily but it also serves as a regulatory authority on the Executive.  It seems the Judiciary is also elected in most of the States in US.

We, in Bharat seem to have made a total mess of the democratic principles. The most important of which is the Rule of the majority. Whether in the direct or representative democracy it is the majority that should decide the policy. The elections should ensure that the winning representative of the citizens should have the backing of at least one more than 50% of the polled votes. Here, in Bharat the Decorative head, President, is elected by indirect elections. The more damaging constitutional provision is that the executive Head, Prime-minister, as well need not even be elected directly. Present PM is Rajyasabha member, where the election does not involve citizen’s vote directly. But to continue as the Prime-minister he must always have backing of Majority Members of Loksabha. There 1+50% is mandatory. But the MPs are elected by a process where they do not need to have majority vote in their respective constituency. So, we have MPs who won the elections by securing only 7% of the polled votes. There are hardly a few members who can claim to have got more than 50% of the polled votes in their own Loksabha seat.

This is systemic failure of the democracy. We do not have democracy in practice here even in the constitutional provisions, it is only notional. Hence the rise of elite ruling class and also the evolution of increasingly divisive politics based on all the possible fault lines of caste, region, language or religion. The only thing the politician has to make sure to win an election is to divide others into enough groups to make his group largest. This is inherent in the system.

We can not hope to have any reforms unless we change this basic flaw in the democratic set-up. Two basic demands need to be put forward.

1)      Direct election of the head of the executive, Prime minister in present scenario. This will need constitutional amendment hence very difficult in the era of coalition politics in which even small regional parties have disproportionate importance and value. But we must start a discourse to create a demand for this. The other alternative is Presidential form of government with direct election of the President being the first step.

2)      Demand for making 1+50% as the winning criterion in all the elections from Panchayat to Rashtrapati. This is relatively easier. It can be done by amending the Peoples Representative act. This can be done by simple majority. The major two political parties are expected to benefit most by this reform so it can be done with consensus. It is morally and logically very sound argument and no one ca deny that those who are denied support by the majority of the voters in their constituency have no right to represent people.

These are not the magic wand reforms which will cure all the evils of our system. Ultimately we need to go beyond the historical experience of just a couple of centuries. The present day system has evolved out of the British raj and has its Historic roots in the colonial period. But for the final cure we will have to go to root cause and for that we will have to still deeper in the Historical experience of the nation. We have known history of more than 5000 years with a golden era every second century. We led the world in economic prosperity, Education, Science and Technology and most importantly a peaceful socio-political system. We had variety of political experiments. We can not bring back the diverse political systems which existed in different parts of Bharat. Hindus have always believed in diversity of expression of the same principle. We followed it in political systems also. The Chakravartis respected the existing system of the conquered state and allowed it to continue. We had so many variations of political systems Gana-rajya with total direct democracy on one end of the spectrum to different forms of complex structures like the Magadha Empire. There were systems where only women ruled. But the basic principle of rule was Dharma. That was the common thread.

What we lack today is the Dharmik System. Today we have to accept the system that has evolved and apply the Dharmik principles to it. That is the Hindu way of digesting the alien. We need a fresh Smriti to interpret Sanatana Dharma according to present day society and to codify Yugadharma. This is our indigenous idea of constitution. We need a Smriti instead of this cut & paste document, that we call Constitution of India.

The parliament house has drawn inspiration for its architecture from the Chausath Yogini Temple in Mitawali, Madhya Pradesh in the same way our democratic structure needs to be based on the sound foundations of the principles of the Dharma of the land. The fractured Democracy demands a complete surgery not just cosmetic make-over.

जनवरी 7, 2012 Posted by | सामायिक टिपण्णी, English Posts | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 टिप्पणियाँ

%d bloggers like this: